See also: IRC log
need to renew charter
maintaining understanding doc
<MichaelC> Post Rec Tasks: http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Post_Recommendation_Tasks
work in TSDTF within WCAG scope
collaborate with ERTWG via the TSDTF in their efforts to create a test suite for evaluation tools
updated Post Rec Tasks in wiki -> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Post_Recommendation_Tasks
extent of collaboration with other organizations on future work (re: WCAG outreach)
work with PFWG on ARIA techniques
<rellero_> 04 01zakim, ?P1 is Roberto_Ellero
promoting WCAG2.0 is important
<rellero_> 04 01zakim, ?P1 is Roberto_Ellero
application notes and adding more techniques (including scripting)
<rellero_> 04 01zakim, ??P1 is Roberto_Ellero
<rellero_> 04 01zakim, ??P1 is Roberto_Ellero
checklists to measure WCAG2.0 understanding
<rellero_> 04 01zakim, ?PP1 is Roberto Ellero
make it easier to submit techniques/ideas
outreach efforts needed (for example to governments)
tools for outreach needed (public relations, workshops, media, etc.)
<rscano> agree
may involve collaboration with EO
WCAG2.0 being examined in conjunction with 508 refresh
<rscano> we will also start a review of italian law (hope in february) for conform to WCAG 2.0
<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask if we need "train the trainer" resources, even workshops
<Loretta> mute mbertoni
people have written books after specs in other WGs
focus on techniques/testing tools in this group
online seminar to promote understanding in addition?
<mbertoni> agree
promote understanding of guidelines/techniques
have list of things we can do (prioritize list?)
<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask if we want to resurrect the break-out teams to do tasks, and have plenary meetings less, as maybe we don't need to make consensus decisions as much
tasks related to items on list
have TSDTF come to WCAG and report
make survey of different tasks and ask for participation
scribe: also time commitment/resources
third-party techniques important
<rscano> and create a VPAT-like for the other technologies?
how to open WCAG to other technologies
with approval of W3C?
should recruit more potential WG members to work on tasks in future
process needed for handling questions/issues
editorial items send to MC
other questions should be answered and documented
additional items may relate to understanding doc - filed as issues?
may involve overhead but keeping WG connected
other category is technical support
point to forums in these cases
scribe: preferably neutral forums
<rscano> a ning :-)
use gl list
gl list needs to focus on wg activities
quality of support may be issue on external lists
frequency of meetings - how often?
depends on results of survey
need mechanism for keeping energy going into work to do (also need deadlines for motivation)
next meeting Feb 5
<rscano> my birthday :D
<scribe> ACTION: MC to create draft WCAG charter for review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2009/01/22-wai-wcag-minutes#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Loretta to create survey of activity areas [recorded in http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2009/01/22-wai-wcag-minutes#action02]