Changelog: Evaluation Approaches for Specific Contexts

This page records change requests and changes made to the draft document Evaluation Approaches for Specific Contexts, which is part of the Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility Resource Suite. Please send additions or corrections to wai-eo-editors@w3.org.

Last updated on $Date: 2005/09/16 19:09:44 $ by $Author: shadi $

Open Review Notes

Notes as of 9 September, 2005

From discussions on the version of 7 September, 2005.

[done] copyedit suggestions from Shawn Henry

[done] revisted capitalization & ending punctuation
[done] matched page navigation titles to section headings
[done] changed list items in "dynamic sites" as subsections
[done] removed section "large and complex sites" according to EOWG discussion (see below)
[done] changed document title and navigation menu title according to EOWG discussion (see below)
[done] added request to re-order the sections to future changes (see below)
[done] added request to reconsider the entire "Evaluation of legacy sites" section to future changes (see below)

[done] copyedit suggestions from Andrew Arch

[done] removed section "large and complex sites" according to EOWG discussion (see below)

[done] edits from EOWG discussion on 9 September, 2005

[done] removed section "large and complex sites" according to EOWG discussion
[done] changed document title and navigation menu title according to EOWG discussion

[done] copyedit suggestions from Pasquale Popolizio

[done] revisited "Firefox", "e.g." and some other punctuation suggestions
[done] reworded "tab" to "navigate" to clarify meaning

Notes on possiblities in the future:

re-order the sections for better grouping of similar topics
reconsider the entire "Evaluation of legacy sites" section
consider a section on evaluating content in the context of security (see comment from Sailesh Panchang

Previous Changes to the Document

Notes as of 24 June, 2005

[done] incoroprate changes from previous change logs: [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: first level: Evaluate all templates. second level, two points. first point: Evaluate static templates using WCAG 1.0 Conformance. second point. Add a minimal amount of plain text content to template and re-evaluate WCAG conformance. Replace existing text in templates section completely.; [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: move "if all dynamic content" down to 2nd bullet under templates & content combined.; [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: add a bullet asking about the content itself: "evaluate the content to ensure that it includes valid markup, with necessary accessibility information where appropriate"; [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: first point: "for pages that are generated...."; second point: "if all dynamic content cannot be evaluated...";; [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: third point: "do the generated pages retain the accessibility features evaluated under templates and content when combined" then as a nested bullet, "does the generated tab order from the template..."; [done] Change log from June 28, 2002: edit "fed back into evaluation tool" say instead "evaluated using WCAG conformance testing."; [done] Change log from June 26, 2002: "if templates are generated..." need to refer to ATAG 1.0, not Selecting Authoring Tools. Point to specific sections of the guidelines.; [done] Change log from June 26, 2002: title of section: "evaluation of database driven dynamically generated web pages" change to "evaluation of dynmically generated Web pages"

Previous Change Logs

Copyright © 2005 W3C (MIT, ERCIM, Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.