ISSUE-647: Should aria-hidden=false put things in the tree, or stay a no-op as it is now, and done in the 1.1 timeframe?
Should aria-hidden=false put things in the tree, or stay a no-op as it is now, and done in the 1.1 timeframe?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification
- Raised by:
- Joanmarie Diggs
- Opened on:
- 2014-03-11
- Description:
- Given the associated issues upon which there will need to be some serious thought, discussion, consensus building, etc.
- *if* the wider group (PFWG/ARIA TF) thinks this is a 1.1 issue.
- *then* we should start talking about it now in general and w.r.t. the UAIG.
- if it's a 2.0 issue, then we can relax some.
See also:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=945194 - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- No related emails
Related notes:
Closing since Mozilla will not implement this functionality, namely, that element with aria-hidden="false" will be forced into the a11y tree. There is a note in the spec for aria-hidden that describes the inconsistency among user agents in this regard.
Joseph Scheuhammer, 13 Dec 2016, 20:53:35Display change log