W3C

Page Visibility

W3C Working Draft 21Candidate Recommendation 26 July 20112012

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-page-visibility-20110721/http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-page-visibility-20120726/
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/page-visibility/
Latest Editor's Draft:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/PageVisibility/Overview.htmlhttp://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/PageVisibility/Overview.html
Previous version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-page-visibility-20110602/http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-page-visibility-20110721/
Editors:
Jatinder Mann (, Microsoft Corp. ), <>
Arvind Jain (, Google Inc. ), <>

Abstract

This specification defines a means for site developers to programmatically determine the current visibility state of the page in order to develop power and CPU efficient web applications.

Status of this document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

ThisW3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to indicate that the document is believed to be stable and to encourage implementation by the Last Call Working Draftdeveloper community.

The entrance criteria for this document to enter the Proposed Recommendation stage is to have a minimum of two independent and interoperable user agents that implementation all the Page Visibility specification.features of this specification, which will be determined by passing the user agent tests defined in the test suite developed by the Working Group.

The Working Group does not expect to advance to Proposed Recommendation prior to . A preliminary implementation report is available and will be updated during the Candidate Recommendation period. This is a work in progress and may change without any notices.

The Working Group intends to gain implementation experience before recommending that implementations remove their vendor prefixes.

Please send comments to public-web-perf@w3.org (archived) with [PageVisibility] at the start of the subject line by .

A diff document with the previous draft is available.

This document is produced by the Web Performance Working Group. The Web Performance Working Group is part of the Rich Web Clients Activity in the W3C Interaction Domain.

You can find the latest Editor's Draft of this document in the W3C's Mercurial repository, which is updated on a regular basis.

Publication as a Working DraftCandidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.

Implementers should be aware that this document is not stable. Implementers who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this document before it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage should join the aforementioned mailing lists and take part in the discussions.Table of Contents

  1. 1 Introduction
  2. 2 Conformance requirements
  3. 3 Terminology
  4. 4 Page Visibility
    1. 4.1 Introduction
    2. 4.2 The DocumentVisibilityExtensions to the Document interface
    3. 4.3 The visibilitychange event
    4. 4.4 Processing Model
    5. 4.5 Vendor Prefixes
  5. 5 Privacy
  6. 6 References
  7. Acknowledgements

1 Introduction

This section is non-normative.

The Page Visibility specification defines a means for site developers to programmatically determine the current visibility of a document and be notified of visibility changes. Without knowing the visibility state of a page, aweb developer must design the webpagedevelopers have been designing webpages as if it isthey are always visible. This not only results in higher machine resource utilization, but it prevents web developers from making runtime decisions based on whether the webpage is visible to the user. Designing web pages with knowledge of the page visibility will allow for improved user experiences and power efficient sites.

With this interface, web applications may chose to alter behavior based on whether they are visible to the user or not. For example, this interface can be used to scale back work when the page is no longer visible. If a web based email client is visible, it may check the server for new mailmessages every few seconds. When hidden it might scale checking email to every few minutes. This interface can also be used to provide better runtime user experience decisions not related to power management. For example, a puzzle game could be paused when the user no longer has the game visible. Further, this interface can be used by advertisers to not charge for ads that are not visible to users.

For example, the following Javascriptscript shows a theoretical web based email client checking for new emailsmessages every second without knowledge of the Page Visibility:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
 <head>
  <script>
   var timer = 0;
   var PERIOD = 1000;

   function onLoad() {
       timer = setInterval(checkEmail, PERIOD);
   }

   function checkEmail() { 
       // Check server for new  emailsmessages
   }
  </script>
 </head>
 <body onload="onLoad()">
 </body>
</html>

The script will always check for emailsmessages every second, even if the user is not actively viewing the page because it is not visible. This is an example of poor resource management.

Using the DocumentVisibility interface,hidden attribute of the Document interface and the visibilitychange event, the page will be able to throttle checking emailmessages to every minute when the page is no longer visible.

The following script show the theoretical web based email client checking for new emailsmessages every second when visible and every minute when not visible:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
 <head>
  <script>
   var timer = 0;
   var PERIOD_VISIBLE = 1000;
   var PERIOD_NOT_VISIBLE = 60000;

   function onLoad() {
       timer = setInterval(checkEmail, (document.hidden) ? PERIOD_NOT_VISIBLE : PERIOD_VISIBLE);
       if(document.addEventListener) document.addEventListener("visibilitychange", visibilityChanged);
   }

   function visibilityChanged() {
       clearTimeout(timer);
       timer = setInterval(checkEmail, (document.hidden) ? PERIOD_NOT_VISIBLE : PERIOD_VISIBLE);
   }

   function checkEmail() { 
       // Check server for new  emailsmessages
   }

  </script>
 </head>
 <body onload="onLoad()">
 </body>
</html>

2 Conformance requirements

All diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative, as are all sections explicitly marked non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. For readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

Requirements phrased in the imperative as part of algorithms (such as "strip any leading space characters" or "return false and abort these steps") are to be interpreted with the meaning of the key word ("must", "should", "may", etc) used in introducing the algorithm.

Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements are to be interpreted as requirements on user agents.

Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. (In particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to be easy to follow, and not intended to be performant.)

The IDL fragments in this specification must be interpreted as required for conforming IDL fragments, as described in the Web IDL specification. [Web IDL]

3 Terminology

The construction "a Foo object", where Foo is actually an interface, is sometimes used instead of the more accurate "an object implementing the interface Foo".

The term DOM4 Page Visibility

4.1 Introduction

This section is used to refer tonon-normative.

This specification introduces an interface that provides Web applications with the API set made availablemeans to scripts in Web applications, and does not necessarily implyprogrammatically determine the existencecurrent visibility of an actual Document object or of any other Node objects as defined in the DOM Core specifications . A DOM attribute is said to be getting when its value is being retrieved (such as by author script), and is said to be setting when a new value is assigned to it. The term "JavaScript" is used to refer to ECMA-262 , rather than the official term ECMAScript, since the term JavaScript is more widely known. 4 Page Visibility 4.1 Introduction This section is non-normative This specification introduces an interface that provides Web applications with the means to programmatically determine the current visibility of a page and be notifieda page and be notified of visibility changes.

4.2 Extensions to the Document interface

The DocumentVisibilityHTML5 specification defines a partial Document interface [NoInterfaceObject][HTML5], which this specification extends:

partial interface  DocumentVisibilityDocument {
   const DOMString PAGE_HIDDEN = "hidden"; const DOMString PAGE_VISIBLE = "visible"; const DOMString PAGE_PREVIEW = "preview";readonly attribute boolean hidden;
  readonly attribute  unsigned shortDOMString visibilityState; 
  // "hidden", "visible", "prerender", "unloaded"
};

Document implements DocumentVisibility;hidden attribute

ThisOn getting, the hidden attribute returnsMUST return true if the Document contained by the top level browsing context (root window in the browser's viewport) [HTML5] is not visible at all. ThisThe attribute returnsMUST return false if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is at least partially visible on at least one screen.

If the defaultView of the Document is null, on getting, the hidden attribute MUST return true.

To accommodate accessibility tools that are typically full screen but still show a view of the page, when applicable, this attribute mayMAY return false when the User Agent is not minimized but is fully obscured by other applications.

Note

As examples, on getting, the hidden attribute returns true when:

Likewise, as examples, on getting, the hidden attribute returns false when:

visibilityState attribute

document.PAGE_HIDDEN ThisOn getting, visibilityState attribute mustMUST return one of the following DOMStrings or a vendor prefixed DOMString as defined in 4.5 Vendor Prefixes:

hidden

On getting, the visibilityState attribute MUST return document.PAGE_HIDDENthe DOMString hidden if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is not visible at all on any screen.

If the defaultView of the Document is null, on getting, the visibilityState attribute MUST return the DOMString hidden.

To accommodate accessibility tools that are typically full screen but still show a view of the page, when applicable, this constant may not be returnedon getting, the visibilityState attribute MAY return the DOMString visible, instead of hidden, when the User Agent is not minimized but is fully obscured by other applications.

Note

For example, in the following cases the visibilityState attribute would return document.PAGE_HIDDENthe DOMString hidden:

document.PAGE_VISIBLE Thisvisible

On getting, the visibilityState attribute mustMUST return document.PAGE_VISIBLEthe DOMString visible if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is at least partially visible at on at least one screen. This is the same condition under which the hidden attribute is set to false.

This constant is not returned if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is not visible, however, a preview of the Document is visible.To accommodate accessibility tools that are typically full screen but still show a view of the page, when applicable, this constant may be returnedon getting, the visibilityState attribute MAY return the DOMString visible when the User Agent is not minimized but is fully obscured by other applications.

document.PAGE_PREVIEW This attribute is optional. Thisprerender

On getting, the visibilityState attribute mayMAY return document.PAGE_PREVIEWthe DOMString prerender if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is not visible at allloaded off-screen and a previewis not visible. User Agent support of the prerender return value of the visibilityState attribute is optional.

unloaded

On getting, the visibilityState attribute SHOULD return the DOMString unloaded if the User Agent is to unload the Document contained by the top level browsing context. User Agent support of the unloaded return value of the visibilityState attribute is visible.optional.

4.3 The visibilitychange event

The visibilitychangeUser Agent MUST fire the visiblitychange event at the Document when the User Agent determines that the visibility of the Document contained by the top level browsing context has changed.

4.4 Processing Model

When the User Agent determines that the visibility of the Document contained by the top level browsing context has changed, the User Agent MUST run the following steps.

If the Document contained by the top level browsing context is now at least partially visible on at least one screen,

  1. If traversing to a session history entry, run the following steps before running the step to fire the pageshow event.

  2. Queue a task that runs the following steps synchronously.

    1. Set the hidden attribute to false.

    2. Set the visibilityState attribute to visible.

    3. Fire a simple event named visiblitychange that bubbles, isn't cancelable, and has no default action, at the Document.

Else if the Document contained by the top level browsing context is fired any timenow not visible or if the user agent is to unload the Document,

  1. If traversing from a session history entry, run the following steps after running the steps to fire the pagehide event.

  2. If the user agent is to unload the Document, run the following steps during the unloading document visibility change steps,

  3. Queue a task that runs the following steps synchronously:

    1. Set the hidden attribute to true.

    2. If the user agent is madeto unload the document.visibilityState attribute. This event can only be registered using addEventListener on document.Document, set the visibilityState attribute to unloaded. This step is optional.

    3. Fire a simple event will get fired onnamed visiblitychange that bubbles, isn't cancelable, and has no default action, at the first change in document.visibilityState after registration; it will not get fired on registration. 4.4Document.

4.5 Vendor Prefixes

If a vendor-specificVendor-specific proprietary user agent extensions are discouraged. If such extensions are needed, e.g., for experimental purposes, vendors MUST use the following extension mechanisms:

If an extension to the visibilityState attribute return value is needed for an experimental visibility state, on getting the visibilityState attribute, vendors must useMUST return a DOMString that uses the following convention:

const DOMString [VENDORPREFIX]_PAGE_[NAME] = "[vendorprefix]-[name]";[vendorprefix]-[name]

Where,

5 Privacy

The Page Visibility API enables third party content on a non-capitalized name givenweb page to determine the visibility state. 5of the Document contained by the top level browsing context with higher precision compared to existing mechanisms, like focus or blur events. However, for practical considerations, the additional exposure is not substantial.

6 References

[IETF RFC 2119]
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, Scott Bradner, Author. Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997. Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
[ DOM Level 3 Core ] Document Object Model Level 3 Core Specification[HTML5]
HTML5, A. Le Hors, et al., Editors.Ian Hickson, Editor. World Wide Web Consortium, 7 April 2004.March 2012. This version of the Document Object Model Level 3 Core RecommendationHTML5 is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407.available from http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/. The latest version of DOM Level 3 Coreeditor's draft is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core. [ ECMA-262 ] ECMAScript Language Specification , 5 th Edition. ECMA International, Standard ECMA-262, December 2009. This version of the ECMAScript Language is available from http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm .http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/.
[ HTML5Web IDL]
HTML5Web IDL, Ian Hickson,Cameron McCormack, Editor. World Wide Web Consortium, May 2011.April 2012. This version of the HTML5Web IDL specification is available from http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ .http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-WebIDL-20120419/. The latest editor's draftversion of Web IDL is available at http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/.http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/.

Acknowledgements

We would like to sincerely thank Karen Anderson, Nic Jansma, Alex Komoroske, Cameron McCormack, James Robinson, Jonas Sicking, Kyle Simpson, Jason Weber, and Boris Zbarsky to acknowledge their contributions to this work.