User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
W3C Working Draft 5-November-1999
- This version:
- (plain text, postscript, pdf, gzip tar file of HTML, zip archive of HTML)
- Latest version:
- Previous version:
- Jon Gunderson, University of Illinois at
Ian Jacobs, W3C
1999 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability,
trademark, document use and
licensing rules apply.
This document provides guidelines to user
agent developers for making their products -- browsers, multimedia
players, plugins -- accessible to people with disabilities. An accessible user
agent allows users with disabilities to retrieve and view Web content or to
enable access when used in conjunction with other software or hardware, called
technologies. These guidelines discuss the accessibility of the user
agent as well as how the user agent communicates with assistive technologies
such as screen readers, screen magnifiers, braille displays, and voice input
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of
this document series is maintained at the W3C.
This is the "Last
Call Working Draft" of "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0". The Last Call review period begins 5
November 1999 and ends 1 December 1999. Please send review comments before the
review period ends to email@example.com.
archives are available on the Web.
At their 3 November 1999 teleconference (3
November minutes), the Working Group decided to move the UA Guidelines to
Last Call. By moving to Last Call, the Working Group asserts that it has met
the requirement of its
charter "to complete the development of user agent accessibility guidelines
addressing accessibility of graphical, voice, and text browsers, multimedia
players, and third-party assistive technologies which work in conjunction with
browsers and multimedia players."
The Working Group anticipates asking the W3C Director to advance this
document to Proposed Recommendation after the Working Group processes Last Call
review comments and incorporates resolutions into the Guidelines.
The Working Group requests that reviewers consider the following issues:
- Checkpoints 10.1
and 10.2 require
user agents to make available to users information about the current input
configuration (e.g., keyboard input). These checkpoints have been assigned
different priorities: Priority 1 for user-specified configuration and Priority
2 for author-specified configuration (e.g., access keys). The Working Group did
not reach consensus on whether these two checkpoints should be merged into a
single checkpoint, and what the priority of such a checkpoint would be.
- Checkpoint 6.1
(Priority 1) asks user agents to implement the accessibility features of
supported specifications. In the Authoring Tool Guidelines
Proposed Recommendation, checkpoints that refer to content accessibility do
so by "Relative Priority". This means that the priority of the checkpoint in
the UAGL depends on how much you wish to conform to the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines. There has been a suggestion to make this a checkpoint with a
Relative Priority rather than Priority 1. The Working Group did not reach
consensus on whether the burden of doing so (complicating the priority
definition) outweighed the benefit of consistency among the three sets of
Guidelines. Also, it is not clear that a Priority 3 requirement in WCAG would
always be a Priority 3 requirement in UAGL (i.e., it may be more important to
implement a feature than for the author to supply it). Comments on the proposal
to make this checkpoint a Relative Priority checkpoint are welcome.
This is a W3C Working Draft for review by W3C Members and other interested
parties. It is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by
other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as
reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress". This is
work in progress and does not imply endorsement by, or the consensus of, either
W3C or Members of the WAI User Agent (UA)
This document has been produced as part of the Web Accessibility Initiative. The goals of the WAI UA Working Group are discussed in the
WAI UA charter. A
list of the UA Working
Group participants is available.
A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be
found at http://www.w3.org/TR.
An appendix to this document [UA-CHECKLIST] lists all checkpoints for convenient
For those unfamiliar with accessibility issues pertaining to user agent
design, consider that many users may be accessing the Web in contexts very
different from your own:
- They may not be able to see, hear, move, or may not be able to process some
types of information easily or at all.
- They may have difficulty reading or comprehending text.
- They may not have or be able to use a keyboard or mouse.
- They may have a text-only screen, a small screen, or a slow Internet
- They may not speak or understand fluently the language in which content is
written or spoken.
- They may be in a situation where their eyes, ears, or hands are busy or
interfered with (e.g., driving to work, working in a loud environment,
User agents must be designed to take into account the diverse functional
requirements of users with disabilities. Software that follows the guidelines
in this document will not only benefit users with disabilities, it will be more
flexible, manageable, and extensible. The guidelines have been chosen according
to some basic principles of accessible design, presented below.
This document is organized according to several principles that will improve
the design of any type of user agent:
The user must have access to the functionalities offered by the user agent
through its user interface. Since some users cannot use some parts of the the
user interface, it needs to be adaptable to their particular functional
One requirement is that users be able to operate the user agent with a
variety of input devices (mouse, keyboard, speech input, etc.) and ouptut
devices (graphical display, speech output, etc.). Redundant input and output
methods (accomplished through the standard input and output APIs supported by the user agent)
help users operate the functionalities built into the tool (made available
through menus, dialogs, toolbars and other user interface components) as well
as those included as part of content (made available through links, form
controls, applets, and other active elements).
User agents should provide access to functionalities in different ways to
meet the skills and needs of different audiences:
- Contextual access (e.g., through cascading menus, through help systems,
etc.) helps users with cognitive impairments and any users unfamiliar with the
- Direct access (e.g., through keyboard or voice shortcuts) helps some users
with motor limitations and speeds up use by experienced users.
The general topic of user interface accessibility for computer software
exceeds the scope of this document. The guidelines do discuss some important
user interface topics such as device-independence, configurability, and
accessible product documentation. Software developers should also remember that
user interfaces must be intuitive, simple, and tested. Features that are known
to promote accessibility should be made obvious to users and easy to find. The
Techniques Document ([UA-TECHNIQUES]) includes some references to general
software accessibility guidelines.
User agents must ensure access to content:
- By ensuring access to all text, video, sound, and other content, including
alternative equivalents for
content (e.g., "alt" attribute values in HTML, external long
descriptions, etc.) and relationships among content (e.g., table cells and
- By allowing users to control content
rendering parameters (text size, colors, synthesized speech rate and
- By allowing users to navigate the content (e.g., with scrollbars,
navigation of active elements,
structured views, etc.).
- By making Web content and user agent information available to assistive technology through
User agents can help the user remain oriented in a page or site by supplying
- Browsing context. Users benefit from knowing the number of frames, the
title of the current frame, whether loading for a page or video clip has
finished or stalled, etc. Graphical clues about browsing context such as
frames, proportional scroll bars, a visually
highlighted selection, etc. help some, but not all users, so the
context information must be available in a device-independent manner.
- Element context. For instance, users with blindness who navigate by surfing
only the links of a page or presentation benefit from information that will
help them decide quickly whether to follow the link: whether the link has
already been visited, the type of the target resource, the length of an audio
or video clip that will be started, whether the link involves a fee, etc.
- Summary information about specific elements (e.g., the dimensions of a
table, the length of an audio clip, the structure of a form, etc.)
The user agent should also minimize the chances the user will become
disoriented. User agents should:
- For changes to the content or viewport that the user does not initiate,
allow the user to request notification when these changes occur. (e.g., when a
viewport opens, a script is executed,
- Allow the user to return to known states. The "back" functionality is a
valuable "undo" tool for returning to a known state.
Following platform and operating system standards and guidelines promotes
accessibility in a number of ways:
- Observing platform and operating system conventions in user interface
design, software installation, and software documentation improves
- Using standard platform and operating system interfaces makes it possible
technologies to access information predictably.
Communication through standard interfaces is particularly important for
graphical desktop browsers, which must make information available to assistive technologies. Even
when a user agent implements a feature natively, it should make relevant
information available through standard interfaces. This will benefit assistive
technologies, scripting tools, and automated test engines. It will also will
promote modularity and software reuse.
The twelve guidelines in this document state general principles for the
development of accessible user agents. Each guideline includes:
- The guideline number.
- The statement of the guideline.
- The rationale behind the guideline and some groups of users who benefit
- A list of checkpoint definitions.
The checkpoint definitions in each guideline explain how the guideline
applies to particular user agent features or behavior. Each checkpoint
- The checkpoint number.
- The statement of the checkpoint.
- The priority of the checkpoint. Priority 1 checkpoints are highlighted
through the use of style sheets.
- Optional informative notes, clarifying examples, and cross references to
related guidelines or checkpoints.
- A link to a corresponding section of the Techniques Document ([UA-TECHNIQUES]), where the checkpoint is discussed in
detail, including information about implementation and examples.
Each checkpoint is intended to be specific enough so that someone reviewing
a user agent may verify that the checkpoint has been satisfied.
Note. While the checkpoints have been designed to be verifiable, some
may be difficult to verify without documentation from vendors about what
features and APIs they support.
An appendix to this document [UA-CHECKLIST] lists all checkpoints for convenient
A related document, entitled "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" ([UA-TECHNIQUES]), suggests techniques for satisfying each
requirement. The Techniques Document has been designed to track changes in
technology and implementation solutions and is expected to be updated more
frequently than the current document.
"User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" is part of a series of accessibility guidelines published by
the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) . The series also includes
"Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" ([WAI-WEBCONTENT]) and "Authoring
Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" ([WAI-AUTOOLS]).
The following editorial conventions are used throughout this document:
element names are in uppercase letters
(e.g., H1, BLOCKQUOTE, TABLE, etc.)
- HTML attribute names are quoted in
lowercase letters (e.g., "alt", "title", "class", etc.)
- Links to definitions are highlighted through the use of style sheets.
Each checkpoint in this document is assigned a priority that indicates its
importance for users.
- This checkpoint must be satisfied by user agents as a
native feature, otherwise one or more groups of users with disabilities will
find it impossible to access information. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic
requirement for some individuals to be able to use the Web.
- This checkpoint should be satisfied by user agents as a
native feature, otherwise one or more groups of users will find it difficult to
access information. Satisfying this checkpoint will remove significant barriers
to accessing Web documents.
- This checkpoint may be satisfied by user agents as a
native feature to make it easier for one or more groups of users to access
information. Satisfying this checkpoint will improve access to the Web for some
The terms "must", "should", and "may" (and related terms) are used in this
document in accordance with RFC 2119 ([RFC2119]).
User agents must satisfy natively
all the applicable
checkpoints for a chosen conformance
This section defines three levels of conformance to this document.
- Conformance Level "A": all Priority 1 checkpoints are
- Conformance Level "Double-A": all Priority 1 and 2
checkpoints are satisfied
- Conformance Level "Triple-A": all Priority 1, 2, and 3
checkpoints are satisfied
Note. Conformance levels are spelled out in text so they
may be understood when rendered as speech.
Claims of conformance to this document must use one of the following two
Form 1: Specify:
- The guidelines title: "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0"
- The guidelines URI:
- The conformance level satisfied: "A", "Double-A", or "Triple-A".
- The version number and operating system of the software covered by the
- The date of the claim.
- A list of checkpoints that have been satisfied and which are considered not
applicable. The appendix list of checkpoints may be used for this purpose (in
or list format).
Example of Form 1:
This product conforms to W3C's "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0", available at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105,
Form 2: Include, on product packaging or documentation, one of three icons
provided by W3C and for Web documentation, link the icon to the appropriate W3C
explanation of the claim.
Note. In the event this document becomes a W3C
Recommendation, information about the icons and how to use them will be
available at the W3C Web site. At that time the Working Group will also
indicate how claims of conformance can deliver completed list of
Since not all users make use of the same hardware for input or output,
software must be designed to work with the widest possible range of devices.
For instance, not all users have pointing devices, so software must not rely on
them for operation. Users must be able to reach all functionalities offered by
the user agent interface with all input device APIs provided by the operating
The best way to make this possible is to design software that follows
operating system conventions and uses standard APIs for user input and output. When user agents
use these standard interfaces, other software can programmatically trigger
mouse or keyboard events. For instance, some users who may not be able to enter
text easily through a standard physical keyboard can still use voice input, an
on-screen keyboard, or other special devices to operate the user agent.
Access to user agent functionality through the operating system's standard
keyboard API (where available) is vital to ensure compatibility between
graphical desktop browsers and assistive technologies. Access through the keyboard
is available to many users and is widely supported.
Since not all users have speakers or the ability to hear, software must not
rely on audio output alone for messages and alerts. Any output provided in
audio should also be available through other means (e.g., visual flashes for
beeps, text messages for spoken messages, etc.). Text is perhaps the most
accessible output medium, since most alternative output mechanisms rely on the
presence of system-drawn text on the screen.
Standard interfaces make it possible for users to use a variety of input and
output devices, including pointing devices, keyboards, braille devices, head
wands, microphones, touch screens, speech synthesizers, and more.
- 1.1 Ensure that every functionality
offered through the user interface is available through every input device
API used by the user
agent. User agents are not required to reimplement low-level functionalities
(e.g., for character input or pointer motion) that are inherently bound to a
particular API and most naturally accomplished with that API. [Priority 1]
- Note. The device-independence required by this checkpoint
applies to functionalities described by the other checkpoints in this document
unless otherwise stated by individual checkpoints. This checkpoint does not
require user agents to use all operating system input device APIs, only to make
the software accessible through those they do use.
- 1.2 Use the standard input and output device
APIs of the
operating system. [Priority 1]
- For example, do not directly manipulate the memory
associated with information being rendered since screen review utilities, which
monitor rendering through the standard APIs, will not work properly.
- 1.3 Ensure that the user can
interact with all active
elements in a
- For example, users who are blind or have motor impairments must be able to
activate the links in a client-side image map
without a pointing device. One technique for doing so is to render client-side
image maps as text links. Note. This checkpoint is an
important special case of
1.4 Ensure that every functionality offered through the user
interface is available through the standard keyboard API.
- The keystroke-only command protocol of the user interface should be
efficient enough to support production use. Functionalities include being able
to show, hide, resize and move graphical viewports
created by the user agent. Note. This checkpoint is an
important special case of
- 1.5 Ensure that all messages to the
user (e.g., informational messages, warnings, errors, etc.) are available
through all output device
APIs used by the
user agent. Do not bypass the standard output APIs when rendering information
(e.g., for reasons of speed, efficiency, etc.).
- For instance, ensure that information about how much
content has been viewed is available through output device APIs. Proportional navigation bars
may provide this information graphically, but the information must be available
(e.g., as text) to users relying on synthesized speech or braille output.
Users may not be able to perceive primary content due to a disability or a
technological limitation or configuration (e.g., browser configured not to display images). Markup languages
may provide a number of mechanisms for specifying alternative representations
of content: through attribute values, element content, or as separate
resources. User agents must also take into account markup related to
natural language rendering, using
appropriate fonts, text directionality, and synthesized speech elements.
In dynamic presentations such as synchronized multimedia presentations
created with SMIL (refer to
[SMIL]), content changes over time. Users with cognitive or physical
disabilities may not be able to interact with a presentation within the time
frames designed by the author. To ensure that a presentation remains
accessible, user agents rendering synchronized presentations must either
provide access to content in a time-independent manner or allow users to control the playback rate of the presentation. For
information about SMIL accessibility, please refer to [SMIL-ACCESS].
User agents should allow users to specify whether primary content should be
rendered, or alternative equivalents supplied by the author, or both.
Mechanisms for specifying alternative content vary according to markup
language. For instance, in HTML or SMIL, the "alt" attribute specifies
alternative text for many elements. In HTML, the content of the OBJECT element
is used to specify alternative content, the "summary" attribute applies to
tables, etc. In HTML, the NOFRAMES element specifies alternative content for
frames. The ability to access frame alternatives is important for users of some
screen readers and users with some cognitive impairments.
- 2.1 Ensure that the user has access to all
content, including alternative representations of content. [Priority 1]
- Note. Although it is not a requirement
that alternative content be available at the same time as primary content, some
users may benefit from simultaneous access. For instance, users with low vision
may want to view images (even imperfectly) but require alternative text for the
image to be rendered in a very large size or as speech.
- 2.2 If more than one alternative equivalent
is available for content, allow the user to choose from among the alternatives.
This includes the choice of viewing no alternatives.
- For example, if a multimedia presentation has several
tracks of closed closed captions (or
subtitles) available (e.g., in different languages, different levels of detail,
etc.) allow the user to choose from among them.
- 2.3 Render content according to
natural language identification.
- Natural language may be identified by markup (e.g., the
"lang" attribute in HTML [HTML40] or "xml:lang" in [XML]) or HTTP headers. Refer also to checkpoint 2.9 and checkpoint 5.3.
- 2.4 Provide time-independent access to
elements or allow the user to
control the timing of changes.
- 2.5 Allow the user to specify that continuous equivalent
tracks (e.g., closed
descriptions, video of sign language, etc.) be rendered at the same time as
audio and video tracks. [Priority 1]
- 2.6 If a technology allows for more than
one audio track, allow the user to choose from among tracks. [Priority 1]
- 2.7 When no text equivalent has been
specified, indicate what type of object is present.
- 2.8 When alternative text has been
specified explicitly as empty (i.e., an empty string), render nothing. [Priority 3]
- 2.9 For identified but unsupported
natural languages, notify the user of language changes when configured to do so. [Priority 3]
Some content or behavior specified by the author may make the user agent
unusable or may obscure information. For instance, flashing content may trigger
seizures in people with photosensitive epilepsy. Blinking can affect
screenreader users, since screenreaders (in conjunction with speech
synthesizers or braille displays) may repeat the text every time it blinks.
Noisy background images or sounds make make it impossible for users to see or
hear other content. Some color combinations may affect users with some visual
Dynamically changing Web content, scripts that open
viewports, automatically forwarded or refreshed pages, and similar
changes unanticipated by the user may disorient some users with cognitive
disabilities and may cause problems for some assistive technologies.
Users may need to turn off these effects in order to have access to content.
Please also refer to guideline
4 and guideline 10.
- 3.1 Allow the user to turn on and
off rendering of background images.
- 3.2 Allow the user to turn on and
off rendering of background audio.
3.3 Allow the user to turn on and off rendering of video. [Priority 1]
3.4 When the user agent renders audio natively, allow the user to
turn on and off rendering of audio.
- 3.5 Allow the user to turn on and off
animated or blinking text.
- 3.6 Allow the user to turn on and off
animations and blinking images.
3.7 Allow the user to turn on and off support for scripts and
applets. [Priority 1]
- Note. This is particularly important for scripts that
cause the screen to flicker, since people with photosensitive epilepsy can have
seizures triggered by flickering or flashing in the 4 to 59 flashes per second
(Hertz) range. Users should be able, for security reasons, to prevent scripts
from executing on their machines.
3.8 Allow the user to turn on and off rendering of images. [Priority 3]
- 3.9 Allow the user to turn on and off
author-specified forwards that occur after a time delay and without user
intervention. [Priority 3]
- For example, when forwarding has been turned off, offer
a static link to the target.
- 3.10 Allow the user to turn on and off
automatic content refresh.
- For example, when turned off, allow the user to refresh
content manually instead (through the user interface).
In order to access content, some users may require that it be rendered in a
manner other than what the author intended. Users with visual impairments,
including color blindness, may be insensitive to certain colors and may not be
able to perceive author-specified or user agent default color combinations.
Users with reduced visual acuity, including people who are older, may require
larger text than user agent defaults or the text size specified by the
User agents must therefore allow the user to
- Style parameters (e.g., text size, colors, audio volume, speech pitch,
video frame rate, etc.). Style information includes author-specified styles and user agent defaults.
- Aspects of the user interface. User agents must ensure access to selection
and focus information and allow users to be notified of and to control
author-specified changes to the browsing context that may make content
Note. The checkpoints in this guideline apply to all
content, in including alternative representations of content.
Refer also to guideline
Checkpoints for fonts and colors:
- 4.1 Allow the user to control font family. [Priority 1]
- 4.2 Allow the user to control the size of text. [Priority 1]
- For example, allow the user to control font size through
style sheets or the user interface. Or allow the user to magnify text.
- 4.3 Allow the user to control foreground color. [Priority 1]
- 4.4 Allow the user to control background color. [Priority 1]
- 4.5 Allow the user to control selection highlighting (e.g., foreground and
background color). [Priority 1]
- 4.6 Allow the user to control focus highlighting (e.g., foreground and
background color). [Priority 1]
Checkpoints for applets and animations:
- 4.7 Allow the user to control animation rate. [Priority 2]
Checkpoints for video.
- 4.8 Allow the user to control video frame rates. [Priority 1]
- 4.9 Allow the user to control the position of audio closed captions.
4.10 Allow the user to start, stop, pause, and rewind video. [Priority 2]
Checkpoints for audio:
- 4.11 Allow the user to control audio playback rate. [Priority 1]
- 4.12 When the user agent renders audio
natively, allow the user to
control the audio volume.
4.13 Allow the user to start, stop, pause, and rewind audio. [Priority 2]
Checkpoints for synthesized speech:
- 4.14 Allow the user to control synthesized speech playback rate.
- 4.15 Allow the user to control synthesized speech volume. [Priority 1]
- 4.16 Allow the user to control synthesized speech pitch, gender,
and other articulation characteristics.
Checkpoints for the user interface:
- 4.17 Allow the user to select from
available author, user, and user agent default style sheets. [Priority 1]
- Note. Users should be able to select no style sheets
(i.e., turn them off).
4.18 Allow the user to
viewports. [Priority 2]
- For example, in HTML, allow the user to control the process of opening a
document in a new target frame or a viewport created by author-supplied
scripts. In SMIL 1.0, allow the user to control viewports created with
show="new". Control may involve prompting the user to confirm or cancel the
viewport creation. Users may also want to control the size or position of the
viewport and to be able to close the viewport (e.g., with the "back"
To promote interoperability, user agents should adopt operating system
conventions and standard APIs for communication, user interface design,
documentation, etc. Following operating
system conventions and supporting standard APIs will promote predictability for
users as well as assistive
technologies that rely on information from other software.
Some operating systems have operating system-level flags and settings that
are pertinent to accessibility, such as high-contrast colors and "show" sounds
for people with hearing impairments. User agents should take these global
settings into account for their own settings.
- 5.1 Provide accessible APIs to other technologies. [Priority 1]
- 5.2 Use accessibility resources and
conventions of the operating system and supported programming languages,
including those for plug-ins and virtual machine environments. [Priority 1]
- For instance, if the user agent supports Java applets
and provides a Java Virtual Machine to run them, the user agent should support
the proper loading and operation of a Java native assistive technology. This
assistive technology can provide access to the applet as defined by Java
5.3 Provide programmatic read and write access to user agent
functionalities and user interface controls.
- For example, ensure that assistive
technologies have access to information about the current input configuration so
that they can trigger functionalities through keyboard events, mouse events,
etc. Refer also to checkpoint
- 5.4 Implement selection and focus mechanisms and make the selection and
focus available to users and through APIs.
- Refer also to checkpoint 7.1
and checkpoint 5.3.
5.5 Provide programmatic notification of changes to content and user
interface controls (including selection and focus).
- Refer also to checkpoint
- 5.6 Conform to W3C Document Object Model
specifications and export interfaces defined by those specifications. [Priority 1]
- For example, refer to [DOM1] and [DOM2]. User agents should export these interfaces using available
operating system conventions. Note. The DOM Level 1
specification states that "DOM applications may provide additional interfaces
and objects not found in this specification and still be considered DOM
5.7 Provide programmatic exchange of information in a timely manner.
- This is important for synchronous alternative renderings and simulation of
5.8 Follow operating system conventions and accessibility settings.
In particular, follow conventions for user
interface design, default keyboard configuration, product installation, and documentation. [Priority 2]
- Refer also to
W3C specifications promote interoperability, which improves accessibility
through predictability and openness. The current guidelines also recommend
implementing W3C specifications (e.g., [HTML32], [HTML40],
[CSS1], [CSS2], [MATHML], [SMIL], etc.) for the following
- W3C specifications include "built-in" accessibility features.
- W3C specifications undergo early review to ensure that accessibility issues
are considered during the design phase.
- W3C specifications are developed in an open, industry consensus
- 6.1 Implement the accessibility
features of supported specifications (markup languages, style sheet languages,
metadata languages, graphics formats, etc.).
- Note. The Techniques Document ([UA-TECHNIQUES]) discusses accessibility features of W3C
- 6.2 Conform to W3C specifications when they
are appropriate for a task.
- For instance, for markup, implement [HTML40] or [XML]. For style sheets, implement
[CSS1], [CSS2], or XSL. For mathematics,
For synchronized multimedia, implement [SMIL]. For access to the structure of HTML or XML
[DOM1]. For an event model, implement [DOM2].
Refer also to checkpoint 5.6.
Navigation mechanisms help all users find the information they seek. User
agents should provide a variety of mechanisms - from simple scrolling through
content to search mechanisms to serial ("tabbing") navigation - to meet the
diverse needs of users, in particular users of devices that render content
serially (e.g., synthesized speech output or single-line refreshable braille
displays). So that users of serial devices are not required to view an entire
page or presentation to find information, user agents should provide more
direct navigation mechanisms.
Authors are encouraged to include navigation mechanisms (e.g., image maps or
navigation bars) designed for their content, but user agents should provide
generic mechanisms, some of which are described here:
- Sequential access (e.g., line scrolling, page scrolling, tabbing access
through active elements, etc.) means advancing through rendered in well-defined
steps (line by line, screen by screen, link by link, etc.) forward and
backward. Sequential access provides context, but can be slow. This navigation
technique benefits users who cannot scan a page for context and any user
unfamiliar with it. Sequential access may be based on element type (e.g., links
only), content structure (e.g., navigate from header to header), or other
criteria. Structured navigation mechanisms allow users to move rapidly through
highly structured content such as books or instructional material.
- Direct access (go to a particular link or paragraph, search for instances
of this string, etc.) is faster than sequential access, but context may be
lost. Direct access benefits users with some motor impairments and power users
familiar with a document. Searching on text is one important variant of direct
access, but other types of direct access are possible (e.g., navigation to a
link based on its position in content). Selecting text or structured content
with the pointing device is another form of direct access.
User agents should allow users to configure navigation mechanisms (e.g., to
allow navigation of links only, or links and headers, or tables and forms,
etc.). Refer also to guideline
Note. For all search and navigation functions, the user
agent should follow operating system conventions for using selection and
focus mechanisms. For instance, the selection should be used to
identify the results of a text search, the focus should identify active elements during sequential navigation of
active elements, etc.
7.1 Allow the user to navigate viewports (including frames). [Priority 1]
- Note. For example, when all frames of a
frameset are displayed side-by-side, allow the user to navigate among them with
the keyboard. Or, when frames are displayed individually (e.g., by a text
browser or speech synthesizer), provide a list of links to individual frames.
Navigating into a viewport makes it the current viewport.
- 7.2 For user agents that offer a
browsing history mechanism, when the user returns to a previous view, restore
the point of regard in
the viewport. [Priority 1]
- For example, when users navigate "back" and "forth"
among views, for each view they should find the viewport position where they
7.3 Allow the user to navigate just among cells of a table (notably
left and right within a row and up and down within a column). [Priority 1]
- Note. Navigation techniques include
keyboard navigation from cell to cell (e.g., using the arrow keys) and page
up/down scrolling. Refer also to checkpoint 1.1 and
7.4 Allow the user to navigate all active elements. [Priority 1]
- Navigation mechanisms may range from sequential (e.g.,
serial navigation by tabbing) to direct (e.g., by entering link text) to
searching on active elements only (e.g., based on form control text, associated
labels, or form control names).
7.5 Allow the user to navigate just among all active elements. [Priority 2]
- Refer also to
7.6 Allow the user to search for rendered text content, including
alternative text content. [Priority 2]
7.7 Allow the user to navigate according to structure. [Priority 2]
- For example, allow the user to navigate familiar elements of a document:
paragraphs, tables, headers, lists, etc.
- 7.8 Allow the user to configure structured navigation. [Priority 3]
- For example, allow the user to navigate only paragraphs, or only headers
and paragraphs, etc.
All users require clues to help them understand their "location" when
browsing. Graphical user agents provide clues such as proportional scroll bars
to indicate how much content has been viewed. A highlighted selection or focus
(either visually or aurally) distinguishes the selected or focused content from
other content. User agent history allows users to track and undo their browsing
path. HTML 4.0 ([HTML40], section 11.2.3) allows authors to create table headers
and footers (with THEAD and TBODY) so that user agents can scroll table content
while keeping table head and foot visible on the screen.
Orientation mechanisms such as these are especially important to users who
view content through serial means such speech or braille (current tactile
technology is limited in the amount of information that can be displayed).
Users of graphically displayed tables can scan a table quickly to understand
the position (and related header information) of a particular cell. For users
of serial output, user agents should provide this context on demand. Similarly,
users need to know about:
- relationships between frames (e.g., how changes in one frame affect
another). Refer also to
- link context. Users who browse by navigating links only require information
about links that will allow them to decide whether to follow the link.
- form context. Users need to know when they've provided all necessary
information in a form before submitting it.
For people with visual impairments, blindness, or certain types of learning
disabilities, it is important that the
point of regard remain as stable as possible. The user agent should
not disturb the user's point of regard by shifting focus to a different frame
or window when an event occurs without notifying the user of the change.
User agents must make orientation information available in an output
Refer also to guideline 1.
- 8.1 Provide a mechanism for highlighting and identifying
(through a standard interface where available) the current viewport, selection, and focus.
- Note. This includes highlighting and
identifying frames. Refer
also to checkpoint 9.1..
8.2 Convey the author-specified purpose of each table and the
relationships among the table cells and headers.
- For example, provide information about table headers, how headers relate to
cells, table caption and summary information, cell position information, table
dimensions, etc. Note. This checkpoint is an important special
case of checkpoint
- 8.3 Provide an outline of a resource
view built from its structural elements (e.g., frames, headers, lists, forms,
tables, etc.) [Priority 2]
- For example, for each frame in a frameset, provide a
table of contents composed of headers where each entry in the table of contents
links to the header in the document.
8.4 Indicate whether a focused link has been marked up to indicate
that following it will involve a fee.
- Note. [MICROPAYMENT] describes how authors
may mark up micropayment information in an interoperable manner. This
information may be provided through the standard user interface provided the
interface is accessible. Thus, any prompt asking the user to confirm payment
must be accessible.
8.5 Provide information to help the user decide whether to follow a
focused link. [Priority 2]
- Note. Useful information includes:
whether the link has already been visited, whether it designates an internal
anchor, the type of the target resource, the length of an audio or video clip
that will be started, and the expected natural language of target
- 8.6 Allow the user to configure the
outline view. [Priority 3]
- For example, allow the user to control the level
of detail of the outline.
Refer also to checkpoint 8.3. Refer
also to checkpoint 5.3.
- 8.7 Allow the user to configure what
information about links to present.
- Note. Using color as the only
distinguishing factor between visited and unvisited links does not suffice
since color may not be perceivable by all users or rendered by all devices. Refer also to checkpoint 8.5.
- 8.8 Provide a mechanism for highlighting and identifying (through a
standard interface where available) active elements.
- Note. User agents may satisfy this
checkpoint by implementing the appropriate style sheet mechanisms, such as link
- 8.9 Maintain consistent user agent
behavior and default configurations between software releases. Consistency is
less important than accessibility and adoption of operating system conventions.
- In particular, make changes conservatively to the layout
of user interface controls, behavior of existing functionalities, and default
Changes to content or browsing context (How many
viewports are open? Which is the current one?) may disorient users
with visual impairments or certain types of learning disabilities. User agents
should provide information about changes caused by scripts, or allow users to
turn off scripts entirely (refer to checkpoint 3.7).
User agents must ensure that notifications are available in an output
Refer also to guideline 1.
- 9.1 Provide information about user agent-initiated content and
viewport changes directly to the user and through APIs.
- For example, inform the users when a script causes a
popup menu to appear.
- 9.2 Ensure that when the selection or focus changes, it is in the viewport after the change. [Priority 2]
- 9.3 Prompt the user to confirm any form
submission triggered indirectly, that is by any means other than the user
activating an explicit form submit control.
- For example, do not submit a form automatically when a
menu option is selected, when all fields of a form have been filled out, on a
mouseover event, etc.
- 9.4 Allow the user to configure
notification preferences for common types of content and viewport changes.
- For example, allow the user to choose to be notified (or
not) that a script has been executed, that a new
viewport has been opened, that a pulldown menu has been opened, that
a new frame has received focus, etc.
- 9.5 When loading content (e.g., document,
video clip, audio clip, etc.) indicate what portion of the content has loaded
and whether loading has stalled.
- 9.6 Indicate the relative position of the
viewport in content (e.g., the percentage of an audio or video clip that has
been played, the percentage of a Web page that has been viewed, etc.). [Priority 3]
- Note. Depending on how the user has
been browsing, the percentage may be calculated according to focus position,
selection position, or viewport position.
Web users have a wide range of functional capabilities and so they must be
able to configure the user agent to
meet their particular requirements.
Refer also to checkpoint
- 10.1 Provide information about the
input configuration (e.g., keyboard or voice bindings specified through the
user agent's user interface).
- 10.2 Provide information about the
input configuration (e.g., keyboard bindings specified in content such as
by "accesskey" in
[HTML40]). [Priority 2]
10.3 Allow the user to change and control the input configuration. Users
should be able to activate a functionality with a single-stroke (e.g.,
single-key, single voice command, etc.).
- Users should not be required to activate functionalities
by navigating through the graphical user interface (e.g., by moving a mouse to
activate a button or by pressing the "down arrow" key repeatedly in order to
reach the desired activation mechanism. Input configurations should allow quick
and direct access that does not rely on graphical output. For self-voicing
browsers, allow the user to modify what voice commands activate
functionalities. Similarly, allow the user to modify the graphical user
interface for quick access to commonly used functionalities (e.g., through
- 10.4 Use operating system conventions
to indicate the input
configuration. [Priority 2]
- For example, on some operating systems, if a functionality is available
from a menu, the letter of the key that will activate that functionality is
- 10.5 Avoid default input configurations that
interfere with operating system conventions.
- For example, the default configuration should not
include "Alt-F4" or "Control-Alt-Delete" on operating systems where that
combination has special meaning to the operating system. In particular, default
configurations should not interfere with the mobility access keyboard modifiers
reserved for the operating system. Refer also to guideline 5.
10.6 Allow the user to
configure the user agent in named profiles that may be shared (by other
users or software). [Priority 2]
- Users must be able to select from among available
profiles or no profile (i.e., the user agent default settings).
- 10.7 Provide default input configurations for
frequently performed operations.
- Make it easy to use the most frequently requested commands. In particular,
provide convenient mappings to functionalities that promote accessibility such
as navigation of links.
- 10.8 Allow the user to configure the graphical arrangement of
user interface controls. [Priority 3]
Documentation includes anything that explains how to install, get help for,
use, or configure the product. Users must have access to installation
information, either in electronic form (CD-ROM, diskette, over the Web), by
fax, or by telephone.
Some people cannot use printed documents. Vendors should provide accessible
electronic documentation for users with visual impairments, learning
disabilities, or movement impairments. Alternative hardcopy formats may also
benefit some users.
Since users who are not disabled are generally unaware of software features
designed specifically for accessibility, those features should be clearly
documented. This will allow users with disabilities to learn about the software
Refer also to checkpoint
11.1 Provide a version of the product documentation that conforms to the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
- User agents may provide documentation in many formats,
but one must be accessible as per [WAI-WEBCONTENT]. Alternative content, navigation
mechanisms, and illustrations will all help make the documentation
- 11.2 Document all user agent features
that promote accessibility.
- For example, review the documentation or help system to
ensure that it discusses the functionalities addressed by the checkpoints of
- 11.3 Document the default input configuration (e.g.,
default keyboard bindings).
- For example, documentation of what user agent features may be activated
with a single keystoke, voice command, or button activation is an important
part of the user interface to users visual impairments, some types of movement
impairments, or multiple disabilities. Without this documentation,these users
may not realize they can accomplish a particular task with a single gesture and
so might unnecessarily avoid that feature of the software. Or they might waste
time and energy using a very inefficient technique to perform a task.
- 11.4 In a dedicated section, document all features of the user
agent that promote accessibility.
- Active elements constitute a user interface for the
document. They have associated behaviors that may be
activated (or "triggered") either through user
interaction or through scripts. Which elements are active depends on the
document language and whether the features are supported by the user agent. In
HTML documents, for example, active elements include links, image maps, form
controls, element instances with a value for the "longdesc" attribute, and
element instances with associated scripts (event handlers) explicitly
associated with them (e.g., through the various "on" attributes).
- An active element's behavior may be triggered through any number of
mechanisms, including the mouse, keyboard, an API, etc. The effect of
activation depends on the element. For instance, when a link is activated, the
user agent generally retrieves the linked resource. When a form control is
activated, it may change state (e.g., check boxes) or may take user input
(e.g., a text field). Activating an element with a script assigned for that
particular activation mechanism (e.g., mouse down event, key press event, etc.)
causes the script to be executed.
- Most systems use the focus to designate the active
element the user wishes to trigger.
- If a user agent offers a functionality, it must ensure
that all users have access to that functionality or an equivalent alternative.
Thus, if the user agent supports keyboard input, it must support accessible
keyboard input. If the user agent supports images, it must ensure access to
each image or an alternative equivalent supplied by the author. If a user agent
supports style sheets, it must implement the accessibility features of the
style sheet language. If the user agent supports frames, it must ensure access
to frame alternatives supplied by the author.
- Not all user agents support every content type, markup
language feature, input or output device interface, etc. When a content type,
feature, or device interface is not supported, checkpoints with requirements
related to it do not apply to the user agent. Thus, if a user agent supports
style sheets at all, all checkpoints related to style sheet accessibility
apply. If a user agent does not support style sheets at all, the checkpoints do
- The applicability of checkpoints related to markup
language features is measured similarly. If a user agent supports tables, it
must support the accessibility features of the language related to tables (or
images, or frames, or video, or links, etc.). The Techniques Document includes
information about the accessibility features of W3C languages such as HTML,
CSS, and SMIL.
- The following summarizes criteria for applicability. A
checkpoint applies to a user agent unless:
- The checkpoint definition states explicitly that it only applies to a
different class of user agent.
- The checkpoint includes requirements about a content type (script, image,
video, sound, applets, etc.) that the user agent does not recognize at all.
- The checkpoint includes requirements about a content type that the user
recognizes but does not support natively.
- The checkpoint refers to the properties of an embedded object (e.g., video
or animation rate) that may not be controlled or accessed by the user
- The checkpoint includes requirements about an unsupported markup language
or other technology (e.g., style sheets, mathematical markup language,
synchronized multimedia, metadata description language, etc.)
- The checkpoint refers to an unsupported input or output device interface.
Note that if the interface is supported at all, it must be supported
- Software or hardware that has been specifically designed
to assist people with disabilities in carrying out daily activities. Assistive
technology includes wheelchairs, reading machines, devices for grasping,
alternative computer keyboards or pointing devices, etc. In the area of Web
Accessibility, common software-based assistive technologies include assistive
technologies, which rely on other user agents for input and/or output. These
- screen magnifiers, which are used by people with visual impairment to
enlarge and change colors on the screen to improve readability of text and
- screen readers, which are used by people who are blind or with reading
disabilities to read textual information through speech or braille
- alternative keyboards, which are used by people with movement impairments
to simulate the keyboard.
- alternative pointing devices, which are used by people with movement
impairments to simulate mouse pointing and button activations.
- To set user preferences. This may be done through the user
agent's user interface, through configuration files, by scripts, etc.
- A continuous equivalent track presents an equivalent
alternative to another track (generally audio or video) and is synchronized
with that track. Continuous equivalent tracks convey information about spoken
words and non-spoken sounds such as sound effects. A continuous text track
presents closed captions. Captions
are generally rendered visually by being superimposed over a video track, which
benefits people who are deaf and hard-of-hearing, and anyone who cannot hear
the audio (e.g., when in a crowded room). A collated text transcript
combines (collates) captions with text descriptions of video information
(descriptions of the actions, body language, graphics, and scene changes of the
video track). These text equivalents make presentations accessible to people
who are deaf-blind and to people who cannot play movies, animations, etc.
- One example of a non-text continuous equivalent track is
description of the key visual elements of a presentation. The
description is either a prerecorded human voice or a synthesized voice
(recorded or generated on the fly). The auditory description is synchronized
with the audio track of the presentation, usually during natural pauses in the
audio track. Auditory descriptions include information about actions, body
language, graphics, and scene changes.
- A video track that shows sign language is another example
of a continuous equivalent track.
- User control of the user agent - interface, behavior,
styles, etc. - means that the user can choose preferred behavior from a set of
options. For instance, control of colors means that the user can choose from
available colors, within the limits offered by the operating system or user
- The term "control" also means "user interface component"
or "form component" in this document. Which meaning is intended should be
apparent from context.
- The ability to make use of software via any input or
output device API provided by the operating system and used by the user agent.
User agents should follow operating system conventions and use standard APIs for device input and
- Documentation includes all product
documentation, notably installation instructions, the help system, and all
- Documents, Elements, and
- A document may be seen as a hierarchy of elements. Elements are defined by a
language specification (e.g., HTML 4.0 or an XML application). Each element may
have content, which generally contributes to the document's content. Elements
may also have attributes that
take values. An element's rendered
content is that which a user agent renders for the element. This
may be what lies between the element's start and end tags, the value of an
attribute (c.f. the "alt", "title", and "longdesc" attributes in HTML), or
external data (e.g., the IMG element in HTML). Rendering is not limited to
graphical displays alone, but also includes audio (speech and sound) and
tactile displays (braille and haptic displays).
- Since rendered content is not always accessible, authors
must specify alternative equivalents for
content that user agents must make available to users or software
that require it (in place of and/or in addition to the "primary" content).
Alternative representations may take a variety of forms including alternative
text, closed captions, and auditory
descriptions. The Techniques Document ([UA-TECHNIQUES]) describes the
different mechanisms authors use to supply alternative representations of
content. Please also consult the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-WEBCONTENT] and ([WAI-WEBCONTENT-TECHS].
- Events and
- When certain events occur (loading or unloading events,
mouse press or hover events, keyboard events, etc.), user agents often perform
some task (e.g., execute a script). For instance, in most user agents, when a
mouse button is released over a link, the link is activated and the linked
resource retrieved. User agents may also execute author-defined scripts when
certain events occur. The script bound to a particular event is called an event handler.
Note. The interaction of HTML, style sheets, the Document Object Model
[DOM1] and scripting is
commonly referred to as "Dynamic HTML" or DHTML. However, as there is no W3C
specification that formally defines DHTML, this document will only refer to
event handlers and scripts.
- The user focus designates an
active element in a document. A viewport has at most one focus. When
several viewports co-exist, each may have a focus, but only one is active,
called the current focus. The
current focus is generally presented (e.g.,
highlighted) in a way that makes it stand out.
- Any mechanism used to emphasize selected or focused
content. Visual highlight mechanisms include dotted boxes, underlining, and
reverse video. Synthesized speech highlight mechanisms may include altering
voice pitch or volume.
- Every user agent functionality available to the user is
mapped to some user interface mechanism, including menus, buttons, keyboard
shortcuts, voice commands. The default input configuration is the mapping the
user finds after installation of the software. The documentation should tell
users what functionalities are available and the user interface should remind
users of the current mapping to the user interface and allow them to figure out
quickly how to use the appropriate software features.
- The insertion point is the location where document editing
takes place. The insertion point may be set by the user (e.g., by a pointing
device or the keyboard editing keys) or through an application programming
interface (API). A viewport has at most one insertion point. When several
viewports co-exist, each may have an insertion point, but only one is active,
called the current insertion
- The insertion point is generally rendered specially (e.g.,
on the screen, by a vertical bar or similar cursor).
- A user agent supports a feature natively if it does not
require another piece of software (e.g., plug-in or external program) for
support. Native support does not preclude more extensive support for
accessibility by assistive
technologies, so user agents must still make information available
- Spoken, written, or signed human languages such as French,
Japanese, American Sign Language, and braille. The natural language of content
may be indicated in markup (e.g., by the "lang" attribute in HTML ([HTML40], section 8.1) or by
Values, and Defaults
- A user agent renders a document by applying formatting
algorithms and style information to the document's elements. Formatting depends
on a number of factors, including where the document is rendered: on screen,
paper, through speakers, a braille device, a mobile device, etc. Style
information (e.g., fonts, colors, voice inflection, etc.) may come from the
elements themselves (e.g., certain style attributes in HTML), from style
sheets, or from user agent settings. For the purposes of these guidelines, each
formatting or style option is governed by a
property and each property may take one value from a set of legal
values. (The term "property" in this document has the meaning ascribed in the
[CSS2].) A reference to "styles" in this document means a set of
- The value given to a property by a user agent when it is
started up is called the property's default
value. User agents may allow users to change default values
through a variety of mechanisms (e.g., the user interface, style sheets,
initialization files, etc.).
- Once the user agent is running, the value of a property
for a given document or part of a document may be changed from the default
value. The value of the property at a given moment is called its current value. Note that changes in
the current value of a property do not change its default value.
- Current values may come from documents, style sheets,
scripts, or the user interface. Values that come from documents, their
associated style sheets, or via a server are called author styles. Values that come from
user interface settings, user style sheets, or other user interactions are
called user styles.
- A user agent is said to recognize markup, content types,
or rendering effects when it can identify (through built-in mechanisms, DTDs,
style sheets, headers, etc) the information. For instance, HTML 3.2 user agents
may not recognize the new elements or attributes of HTML 4.0. Similarly, a user
agent may recognize blinking content specified by elements or attributes, but
may not recognize that an applet is blinking. The Techniques Document ([UA-TECHNIQUES]) discusses some content that affects
accessibility and should be recognized as such.
- The user selection generally specifies a range of content
(text, images, etc.) in a document. The
selection may be structured (based on the document tree) or
unstructured (e.g., text-based). Content may be selected through user
interaction, scripts, etc. The selection may be used for a variety of purposes:
for cut and paste operations, to designate a specific element in a document, to
identify what a screen reader should read, etc.
- The user selection may be set by the user (e.g., by a
pointing device or the keyboard) or through an application programming
interface (API). A viewport has at most one user selection. When several
viewports co-exist, each may have a user selection, but only one is active,
called the current user
- The user selection is usually presented in a way the
stands out (e.g., highlighted). On the screen,
the selection may be highlighted using colors, fonts, graphics, or other
mechanisms. Highlighted text is often used by assistive technologies to
indicate through speech or braille output what the user wants to read. Most
screen readers are sensitive to highlight colors. Assistive technologies may
provide alternative presentation of the selection through speech, enlargement,
or refreshable braille display.
- A text transcript is a text equivalent of audio
information that includes spoken words and non-spoken sounds such as sound
effects. Refer also to
continuous equivalent track.
- Viewports that are created by the user agent process. This
refers to viewports that display content and does not include, for example,
messages or prompts to the user.
- Standard Device
- Operating systems are designed to be used by default with
devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, voice input, etc. The operating
system (or windowing system) provides standard APIs for these devices that should be used by
user agents and other software for input and output to those devices. For
example, for desktop computers today, user agents are expected to use the mouse
and keyboard APIs for input. For touch screen devices or mobile devices,
standard input APIs may include stylus, buttons, voice, etc. The display and
sound card are considered standard ouput devices for a graphical desktop
computer environment and each has a standard API. Note. What
is considered "standard" for a particular environment will change over
- User-initiated and
- User-initiated actions result from user input to the user
agent. User Agent-initiated actions result from scripts, operating system
conditions, or built-in user agent behavior.
- A user agent is an application that retrieves and renders
Web resources, including text, graphics, sounds, video, images, and other
objects. An user agent may require additional software to handle some types of
content. For instance, a browser may run a separate program or plug-in to
render sound or video. The additional software is also considered a user agent.
User agents include graphical desktop browsers, multimedia players, text
browsers, voice browsers, and assistive technologies such as screen readers, screen
magnifiers, speech synthesizers, onscreen keyboards, and voice input
- Views, Viewports, and Point of
- User agents may handle different types of source
information: documents, sound objects, video objects, etc. The user perceives
the information through a
viewport, which may be a window, frame, a piece of paper, a
panner, a speaker, a virtual magnifying glass, etc. A viewport may contain
another viewport (e.g., nested frames, plug-ins, etc.).
- User agents may render the same content in a variety of
ways; each rendering is called a view.
For instance, a user agent may allow users to view an entire document or just a
list of the document's headers. These are two different views of the
- The view is how source information is rendered
and the viewport is where it is rendered. Both the current focus and
the current user selection must be in the same viewport, called the current viewport. The current
viewport is generally highlighted when several
- Generally, viewports give users access to all rendered
information, though not always at once. For example, a video player shows a
certain number of frames per second, but allows the user to rewind and fast
forward. A graphical browser viewport generally features scrollbars or some
other paging mechanism that allows the user to bring the rendered content into
- The content currently available in the viewport is called
the user's point of regard.
The point of regard may be a two dimensional area (e.g., for graphical
rendering) or a single point (e.g., for aural rendering or voice browsing).
User agents should not change the point of regard unexpectedly as this can
Many thanks to the following people who have contributed through review and
comment: Paul Adelson, James Allan, Denis Anson, Kitch Barnicle, Harvey
Bingham, Olivier Borius, Judy Brewer, Bryan Campbell, Kevin Carey, Wendy
Chisholm, David Clark, Chetz Colwell, Wilson Craig, Nir Dagan, Daniel
Dardailler, B. K. Delong, Neal Ewers, Geoff Freed, John Gardner, Al Gilman,
Larry Goldberg, Glen Gordon, John Grotting, Markku Hakkinen, Earle Harrison,
Chris Hasser, Kathy Hewitt, Philipp Hoschka, Masayasu Ishikawa, Phill Jenkins,
Jan Kärrman (for help with html2ps), Leonard Kasday, George
Kerscher, Marja-Riitta Koivunen, Josh Krieger, Catherine Laws, Greg Lowney,
Scott Luebking, William Loughborough, Napoleon Maou, Charles McCathieNevile,
Karen Moses, Masafumi Nakane, Mark Novak, Charles Oppermann, Mike Paciello,
David Pawson, Michael Pederson, Helen Petrie, David Poehlman, Michael Pieper,
Jan Richards, Hans Riesebos, Joe Roeder, Lakespur L. Roca, Gregory Rosmaita,
Lloyd Rutledge, Liam Quinn, T.V. Raman, Robert Savellis, Rich Schwerdtfeger,
Constantine Stephanidis, Jim Thatcher, Jutta Treviranus, Claus Thogersen, Steve
Tyler, Gregg Vanderheiden, Jaap van Lelieveld, Jon S. von Tetzchner, Willie
Walker, Ben Weiss, Evan Wies, Chris Wilson, Henk Wittingen, and Tom
For the latest version of any W3C specification, please consult the list of
W3C Technical Reports.
- "CSS, level 1
Recommendation", B. Bos, H. Wium Lie, eds., 17 December 1996, revised 11
January 1999. This CSS1 Recommendation is
- "CSS, level 2
Recommendation", B. Bos, H. Wium Lie, C. Lilley, and I. Jacobs, eds., 12
May 1998. This CSS2 Recommendation is
- "Accessibility Features of
CSS", I. Jacobs, J. Brewer, The latest version of this W3C Note is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS-access.
Object Model (DOM) Level 1 Specification", V. Apparao, S. Byrne, M.
Champion, S. Isaacs, I. Jacobs, A. Le Hors, G. Nicol, J. Robie, R. Sutor, C.
Wilson, and L. Wood, eds. The 1 October 1998 DOM Level 1 Recommendation is
- "Document Object Model (DOM)
Level 2 Specification", L. Wood, A. Le Hors, V. Apparao, L. Cable, M.
Champion, J. Kesselman, P. Le Hégaret, T. Pixley, J. Robie, P. Sharpe,
C. Wilson, eds. The DOM2 specification is a Working Draft at the time of
- "HTML 4.0
Recommendation", D. Raggett, A. Le Hors, and I. Jacobs, eds. The 24 April
1998 HTML 4.0 Recommendation is
- "HTML 3.2 Recommendation", D.
Raggett, ed. The HTML 3.2 Recommendation is
Markup Language", P. Ion and R. Miner, eds. The 7 April 1998 MathML 1.0
Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-MathML-19980407
- "Common Markup for
micropayment per-fee-links", T. Michel, ed. The latest version of this W3C
Working Draft is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/Micropayment-Markup.
- "Key words for use in RFCs to
Indicate Requirement Levels", S. Bradner, March 1997.
Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 1.0 Specification", P. Hoschka,
editor. The 15 June 1998 SMIL 1.0 Recommendation is
- "Accessibility Features of
SMIL", M-R. Koivunen, I. Jacobs. The latest version of this W3C Note is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL-access.
- An appendix to this document lists all of the checkpoints, sorted by
priority. The checklist is available in either tabular form
(at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105/full-checklist) or list form (at
- "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0", J. Gunderson,
I. Jacobs, eds. This document explains how to implement the checkpoints defined
in "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0". The draft of the Techniques Document available at the time of
this document's publication is
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-TECHS-19991105. The latest draft of the techniques is available at
- "Authoring Tool
Accessibility Guidelines", J. Treviranus, J. Richards, I. Jacobs, C.
McCathieNevile, eds. The latest Working Draft of these guidelines for designing
accessible authoring tools is available at
- "Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines 1.0", W. Chisholm, G. Vanderheiden, and I. Jacobs,
eds. The 5 May 1999 Recommendation is
- "Techniques for Web
Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0", W. Chisholm, G. Vanderheiden, and I.
Jacobs, eds. The latest version of this document is available at
- "Extensible Markup
Language (XML) 1.0.", T. Bray, J. Paoli, C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, eds. The 10
February 1998 XML 1.0 Recommendation is