ISSUE-68: Disambiguation (and term)
Disambiguation (and term)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- Felix Sasaki
- Opened on:
- 2013-01-10
- Description:
- See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0014.html - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-435 on Tadej Štajner to Take care of disambig -> tan examples - due 2013-02-06, closedACTION-451 on Christian Lieske to Edit issue-68 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0221.html into the its2 draft - due 2013-03-04, closedACTION-461 on Christian Lieske to Make the edit for issue-68 - due 2013-03-27, closedACTION-472 on Jirka Kosek to Update schema wrt text analysis annotation and check the test suite and spec against updated schema - due 2013-04-07, closed- Related emails:
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-04-03 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-04)
- [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
- Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-04-01)
- Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-01)
- Re: [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-04-01)
- [All] Edits for [issue-68] and [ACTION-461] - Please review content on "Text Analysis" (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-03-31)
- Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 27 March, 1 p.m. UTC (from olaf@stefanov.at on 2013-03-27)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 27 March, 1 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-27)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-03-20 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-20)
- [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) - Steady state for Update of Specification, correct? (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-03-18)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-27)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-27)
- RE: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
- Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
- [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
- AW: [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com on 2013-02-25)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-25)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-22)
- Re: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-22)
- Fwd: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-22)
- [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-22)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-02-20)
- Re: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-18)
- RE: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-18)
- [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
- RE: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-02-12)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-11 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-06 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from olaf@stefanov.at on 2013-02-11)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-07)
- Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-02-06)
- Re: [agenda] MLW-LT call 6th Feb, 1 pm UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-06)
- [agenda] MLW-LT call 6th Feb, 1 pm UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-06)
- RE: agenda+ for Wednesday (WG Draft about high level use cases (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434])) (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-02-05)
- Re: Issue-68 - Disambiguation (and term) - new name for Disambiguation (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-05)
- Issue-68 - Disambiguation (and term) - new name for Disambiguation (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-05)
- agenda+ for Wednesday (WG Draft about high level use cases (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434])) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-05)
- Fwd: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-04)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-01)
- Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-31)
- RE: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-31)
- Re: Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-31)
- Issue-68: RE: Thoughts? (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-31)
- Re: Issue-68 (not 67) - Term + Disambiguation (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
- RE: Issue-67 - Term + Disambiguation (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-30)
- AW: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from stephan.walter@cocomore.com on 2013-01-30)
- issue-68 proposal to structure today's discussion (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-30)
- AW: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-30)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-29)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-29)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-28)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: Multilayer proposal, not standoff revision (Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Multilayer proposal, not standoff revision (Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-28)
- [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-27)
- RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-27)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-01-27)
- issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-24)
- Re: Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2013-01-23)
- Atb.: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-23)
- Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
- mass regrets - Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-21)
- RE: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-21)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 21 January, 2 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
- Re: Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from Dominic.Jones@scss.tcd.ie on 2013-01-16)
- Update [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-16)
- Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- [Agenda] MLW-LT call 2013-01-16, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
- RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
- Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- Re: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-15)
- RE: Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-15)
- Disambiguation and terminology producers (Re: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term))) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-14)
- RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from christian.lieske@sap.com on 2013-01-14)
- RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-11)
- RE: issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-11)
- issue-68 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Disambiguation (and term)) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
- [All] last call comment handling (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-11)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-68: Disambiguation (and term) [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-10)
Related notes:
[fsasaki]: DECISION-DETAILS: under discussion
24 Jan 2013, 11:28:13Mail from Yves (implementer) stating that the implementation of the proposed change would be relatively minor
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0257.html
RESOLUTION: rejected
David Filip, 20 Feb 2013, 13:59:13DECISION-DETAILS: Merger of the categories was rejected. The discussion led however to editorial changes of the Disambiguation category (renaming and simplification).David Filip, 20 Feb 2013, 14:01:18
CHANGE-TYPE: editorial
David Filip, 20 Feb 2013, 14:02:25COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Mar/0129.html
David Filip, 20 Mar 2013, 13:33:07CHANGE-TYPE: substantive
Felix Sasaki, 7 May 2013, 22:11:11Display change log