ISSUE-2056: Consider referring to Instead of linking to CSS2.1 instead of CSS2

Ref to CSS2.1

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SVG 1.2 Tiny: Last Call

Raised by:

Doug Schepers

Opened on:

2008-09-17

Description:

Mohamed ZERGAOUI
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0056.html>
[[
Instead of linking to CSS2 REC, you should link to CSS2.1 CR (which
hopefully by the time will become a REC)
]]

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish refs.html,1.126,1.127 refs.xhtml,1.84,1.85 single-page.html,1.192,1.193 styling.html,1.99,1.100 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-11-03)
SVG/profiles/1.2T/master refs.html,1.104,1.105 styling.html,1.42,1.43 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-11-03)
SVG/profiles/1.2T doc-svgt12.html,1.10,1.11 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-11-02)
SVG/profiles/1.2T doc-svgt12.html,NONE,1.1 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-10-28)
Re: Logistics of Open Issues (from schepers@w3.org on 2008-10-16)
Closing ACTION-2273 (from chris@w3.org on 2008-10-10)
Minutes, 7 October 2008 SVG WG telcon (from chris@w3.org on 2008-10-07)
Re: ISSUE-2056 (Ref to CSS2.1): Consider referring to Instead of linking to CSS2.1 instead of CSS2 [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] (from chris@w3.org on 2008-09-18)
Minutes, SVG telcon Thursday 18 September 2008 (from anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au on 2008-09-18)
[1.2T-LC] SVG should link to CSS2.1 CR (ISSUE-2056) (from schepers@w3.org on 2008-09-17)
ISSUE-2056 (Ref to CSS2.1): Consider referring to Instead of linking to CSS2.1 instead of CSS2 [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-09-17)

Chris Lilley, 7 Oct 2008, 10:46:57

Doug Schepers, 10 Oct 2008, 21:58:22

Compromise; did not change normative dependency, but noted that CSS 2 may be deprecated in favor of CSS 2.1. Commenter satisfied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0012.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Nov/0038.html

Doug Schepers, 3 Nov 2008, 21:10:18