ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs

Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs

State:
closed
Person:
Vladimir Levantovsky
Due on:
February 17, 2016
Created on:
February 10, 2016
Related emails:
  1. Minutes, 02 March 2016 WebFonts call (from chris@w3.org on 2016-03-02)
  2. Re: Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 2 (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-03-01)
  3. Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 2 (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-03-01)
  4. RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-18)
  5. Re: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-18)
  6. RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-18)
  7. Re: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-17)
  8. RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-16)
  9. Telcon Minutes Feb 10, 2016 (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-10)
  10. WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-02-10)

Related notes:

See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2016Feb/0019.html for details

Vladimir Levantovsky, 17 Feb 2016, 14:37:20

Display change log.

Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky@gmail.com>, Garret Rieger <grieger@google.com>, Chairs, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 196.html,v 1.1 2021/06/25 09:17:37 carcone Exp $