This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 983 - Example for ICS claim
Summary: Example for ICS claim
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: QA
Classification: Unclassified
Component: QASpec-GL (show other bugs)
Version: LC-2004-11-22
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Karl Dubost
QA Contact: Karl Dubost
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: LC, SpecGL
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-10 04:05 UTC by Karl Dubost
Modified: 2005-04-28 11:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Karl Dubost 2005-01-10 04:05:27 UTC
Lynne Rosenthal has proposed an example for ICS claim: WCAG 1.0.

Karl Dubost to add the WCAG 1.0 example.
Comment 1 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-03-04 02:09:13 UTC
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0049.html

The issue as stated is a hybrid of 1.2A, B, C.  There really 
isn't any "ICS claim" in SpecGL.  Karl will clarify.  (AI to Karl:  look 
for an example of GP 1.2C (2005-02-28).)  Some discussion about whether we 
have to drop 1.2C if we can't find an example.  WCAG almost goes all the 
way:  it has wording for conformance claim, and it has an ICS (checklist), 
but it doesn't combine a reference to ICS into conformance claim wording.
Comment 2 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-03-21 14:08:39 UTC
Proposal is to go with 2 approximative examples, and show how to improve them
for real conformance to given GP:
http://www.w3.org/mid/5e3b95f1d5c7f820f668a84e44d7bdf3@w3.org
Comment 3 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-04-08 09:29:57 UTC
RESOLUTION: we'll publish a fullfiled ICS for SpecGL and use it as an example
for the relevant GP as part of resolution of issue 983

RESOLUTION: We'll also use ATAG and UAAG as part of our example for including an
ICS as part of a conformance claim (issue 983)
Comment 4 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-04-28 11:53:51 UTC
setting version to LC in case of future use