Bug 6594 – Transfer: Add extensibility points for WS-Transfer wrappers

First Last Prev Next No search results available

Details

Summary:

Transfer: Add extensibility points for WS-Transfer wrappers

Bug#:	6594
Product:	WS-Resource Access
Component:	Transfer
Status:	CLOSED
Resolution:	REMIND

Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Version:	FPWD
Priority:	P2
Severity:	normal
Target Milestone:	---

URL:

Whiteboard:

Keywords:

hasProposal

Depends on:

6398 6672 6673

Blocks:

Show dependency tree - Show dependency graph

People

Reporter:	Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Assigned To:	Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
QA Contact:	notifications mailing list ...
CC:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Related actions

Description:	Opened: 2009-02-19 00:12

From:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0043.html

Once/if we decide on wrappers for the Transfer operations we should
make sure they have proper extensibility points - in particular
modify Transfer as follows:

T-GetResponse:
<wst:GetResponse ...> 
 xs:any + 
</wst:GetResponse> 

change the xs:any+ to xs:any*

T-PutRequest:
<wst:Put ...> 
 xs:any +
</wst:Put> 

change the xs:any+ to xs:any*

T-PutResponse:
<wst:PutResponse ...> 
 xs:any ? 
</wst:PutResponse>

change the xs:any+ to xs:any*

T-DeleteResponse:
<wst:DeleteResponse ...>
 xs:any ?
</wst:DeleteResponse>

change the xs:any? to xs:any*

T-CreateResponse:
<wst:CreateResponse ...> 
  <wst:ResourceCreated>
  xs:any ?
</wst:CreateResponse>

change the xs:any? to xs:any*

By making this change it will allow for extension specifications to
have more flexibility in what they send/receive.

------- Comment #1 From Robert Freund 2009-03-03 12:27:19 -------

proposed on 2009-02-28 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Feb/0154.html

------- Comment #2 From Robert Freund 2009-03-17 20:51:00 -------

Action-52

------- Comment #3 From Robert Freund 2009-03-19 09:49:12 -------

Proposal at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0088.html

------- Comment #4 From Robert Freund 2009-05-13 08:01:11 -------

resolved with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Apr/att-0162/I6594-6672-6673-prop-ibm.doc
on 2009-05-12

First Last Prev Next No search results available