This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3559 - Conformance Sections needed for both specs
Summary: Conformance Sections needed for both specs
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS-Policy
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Framework+Attachment (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Umit Yalcinalp
QA Contact: Web Services Policy WG QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-01 17:25 UTC by Umit Yalcinalp
Modified: 2006-09-13 23:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Umit Yalcinalp 2006-08-01 17:25:57 UTC 
Title: Conformance Sections needed for both specs 

Description: 

Currently, the WS-Policy Framework [WS-Policy] and WS-Policy Attachment [WS-PolicyAttachment] specifications do not contain a conformance section. 

Justification: 

Other WS specifications that specify a language, protocol or utilization of a language contain a conformance section in W3C and other standards organizations. 

The examples include, but not limited to,  

-- WSDL 2.0 specification [WSDL 2.0] Section 1.2 Document Conformance and Section 8. 
-- WS-Addressing SOAP Binding Specification [WS-Addressing SOAP Binding] Section 8. 
-- WS-Addressing WSDL Binding Specification [WS-Addressing WSDL Binding] Section 6. 

Target: WS-Policy Framework and WS-Policy Attachment specifications 

Proposal: 

Add a separate conformance section to both specifications, WS-Policy Framework and WS-Policy Attachment. 

References: 

[WSDL 2.0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327 
[WS-Addressing SOAP Binding] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-soap-20060509/#conformance 
[WS-Addressing WSDL Binding] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/
Comment 1 Umit Yalcinalp 2006-08-01 17:56:32 UTC 
The email that reported this issue is found in 

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0100.html