ISSUE-394: Rational definition
numdenom
Rational definition
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- TTML IMSC 1.0
- Raised by:
- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
- Opened on:
- 2015-06-11
- Description:
- From:https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2015Jun/0001.html
> : numerator denominator // numerator != 0; denominator != 0
can I use "01 01"? (For simplicity, I'd encourage you to say no, and
then fix your grammar)
can I use "00 00"? (00 != 0 in string parsing...)
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com on 2015-06-19)
- Re: [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com on 2015-06-19)
- Re: [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com on 2015-06-19)
- Re: [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from glenn@skynav.com on 2015-06-18)
- Re: [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from glenn@skynav.com on 2015-06-18)
- [minutes] TTWG call june 18th 2015 (from tmichel@w3.org on 2015-06-18)
- {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-06-11 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-06-11)
- Re: [imsc] CR: TTML Text and Image Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0 (from pal@sandflow.com on 2015-06-11)
- ISSUE-394 (numdenom): Rational definition [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-11)
Related notes:
Explicit parsing from decimal string representation added at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/81908989a5e6
"01 01" is allowed as much as "24000 1000" is allowed.
yes, 1 = 01 = 001 = 0001, semantically
there is nothing wrong with the grammar
Display change log