xmlschema-dev@w3.org from February 2013 by author

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Thursday, 14 February)

David Ezell

RE: [ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1 (Thursday, 21 February)

George Cristian Bina

Re: [ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1 (Wednesday, 27 February)
[ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1 (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)
Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)

Jean-Jacques Thomasson

Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 26 February)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Monday, 18 February)
Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Friday, 15 February)
Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Thursday, 14 February)

Liam R E Quin

Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Monday, 18 February)

Michael Kay

Re: Included <schema> (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)

Mukul Gandhi

Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Included <schema> (Tuesday, 12 February)

Noah Mendelsohn

Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing? (Monday, 18 February)

Ramkumar Menon

XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial (Tuesday, 19 February)

Shashikala Shamarao

My Brutal Experience...............................!!! Help Needed!!! (Saturday, 9 February)

srinivasarao vegunta

[xmlschema-dev] <none> (Tuesday, 12 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 27 February 2013 19:44:14 UTC