- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:45:17 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html I found: "finding agreement on the proposed paragraphs...@@" the proposed para that was read out was: > >If the WebOnt language is to > 1/ use RDF syntax, and > 2/ be an extension of RDF, and > 3/ to be able to entail appropriate class memberships, >then the WebOnt language needs to have a facility for having RDF triples >that do not denote in the RDF model theory (a.k.a. dark triples) and URI >references that do not denote in the RDF model theory (e.g., URI references >that only exist in dark triples). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 08:45:35 UTC