Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

Hi Jeff,

> Could you please explain what you mean by "least power thing" and
> "triple integrated circuits." Thanks!

I would like to refer to our implementation experience
with triples in Euler [1], but I guess this is a bit
off-topic for this list ;-)
The triple is the basis class and all the rest is
derivations from triple combinations.
I think that always having ``subject predicate object''
is supporting meaningful derivations.

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

[1] http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/

Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 18:47:45 UTC