www-archive@w3.org from November 2008 by author

Andrew Eisenberg

• Re: Mark Logic XQTS Test Results (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: XQTS result submission for XQSharp (Monday, 3 November)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: HTML5 spec (Friday, 21 November)

Charles Prakash Dasari

• RDF, Semantic Web - recent activity (Saturday, 22 November)

Dan Brickley

• xproc, csv, lqraps...? (Saturday, 29 November)

Dan Connolly

• RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61] (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: market research for HTML in Asia Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
• markup validator test log (Monday, 17 November)
• market research for HTML in Asia Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
• email subjects and threads Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Prompt, please, into which door i must to knock (was: budget to implement HTML6) (Wednesday, 12 November)

Dean Edridge

• Re: The HTML5 process is fair (Monday, 24 November)
• The HTML5 process is fair (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Sunday, 23 November)
• The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: HTML5 spec (Friday, 21 November)
• HTML5 spec (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: email subjects and threads Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• RE: Content Transformation Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 14 November)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: [automattic] False Marketing (Saturday, 15 November)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 26 November)

Henry Story

• Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61] (Wednesday, 26 November)

Ian Hickson

• RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal (Saturday, 29 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 28 November)
• Re: aria-dialog and html5 element dialogue (a proposal) (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: several messages about Acid3 (Tuesday, 18 November)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: market research for HTML in Asia Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)

Julian Reschke

• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: The HTML5 process is fair (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: The HTML5 process is fair (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: The HTML5 project is a joint effort between the W3C and the WHATWG (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
• Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)

Karl Dubost

• Re: market research for HTML in Asia Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 21 November)
• Data Independence Check List (Monday, 17 November)

L. David Baron

• Re: Acid3 and css3-mediaqueries, again (Sunday, 2 November)

Larry Masinter

• RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal (Friday, 28 November)
• RE: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal (Friday, 28 November)
• RE: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference (Monday, 24 November)
• RE: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference (Sunday, 23 November)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal (Friday, 28 November)
• Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: ZIP-based packages and URI references within them, [widgets, uriBasedPackageAccess-61] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: [widgets] Minutes from 30 October 2008 Voice Conference (Friday, 21 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 28 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 25 November)

Matt Mullenweg

• Re: [automattic] False Marketing (Sunday, 16 November)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 26 November)

Oliver Hallam

• XQTS result submission for XQSharp (Friday, 31 October)

olivier Thereaux

• Re: markup validator test log (Monday, 17 November)

Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)

• Widget Addressing Timescales and Test Cases. (Friday, 21 November)
• RE: Content Transformation Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 14 November)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 November 2008 20:42:19 UTC