- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 21:35:07 +0100
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vkos45zS+_vApuOWXENkq41=EyDaLzxGf8W-o91eHq5iA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I am unclear as to why XML is included? <p class="note">This Success Criterion should be considered as always satisfied for any content using HTML or XML.</p> I don't believe it is the case that XHTML served as application/XML to a browser, for example test.xhtml: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>Title of document</title> </head> <body> some content here... <b><i>Some text</b></i> <p>This is a paragraph <p>This is another paragraph </body> </html> is parsed by and coerced into a DOM using the HTML parser. For example when opened in Chrome I get the following error This page contains the following errors: > error on line 10 at column 21: Opening and ending tag mismatch: i line 10 > and b > Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error. > some content here... On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 19:43, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Laura > > On 5/2/23, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > > Call For Consensus — ends Monday May 8th at 1pm Boston time. > > > > > > > > We previously agreed to add notes to WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 for SC 4.1.1 > Parsing: > > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0426.html > > > > > > > > We followed up with a meeting where we agreed the wording: > > > > https://www.w3.org/2023/04/04-ag-minutes#item04 > > > > > > > > This CFC is to agree the wording, which is available in this PR: > > > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3152/files > > > > > > > > The next step (in a future CFC) will be to agree the re-publishing of > WCAG > > 2.1 & 2.0 in order that these notes (and all the previous errata) are > > visible in the latest versions of each. > > > > > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being > > able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the > CfC > > deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com> > > > > > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2023 20:35:52 UTC