Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

+1

--
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ / https://github.com/patrickhlauke / 
https://codepen.io/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ / https://www.deviantart.com/redux
https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke


------ Original Message ------
From "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>
To "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date 27/04/2023 00:12:14
Subject CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

>Hi everyone,
>
>
>
>Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday 2nd April at 5pm Boston time.
>
>
>
>The Working Group has agreed (in meetings) to re-start the Candidate 
>Recommendation stage for WCAG 2.2.
>
>
>
>This CFC is to approve that transition into CR, including the changes 
>made since the last one.
>
>
>
>There are updates to Target Size and Focus Appearance, which can be 
>viewed here:
>
>https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3123/files
>
>
>
>These two SCs will be marked ‘at risk’, with a fallback to the previous 
>versions. If that fall back is also not agreed, then it would result in 
>removal. (For Focus Appearance, the fallback would be the previous text 
>at AAA level.)
>The fallbacks for ‘at risk’ are subject to approval from W3C 
>management, we would return to the group if it is not approved.
>
>
>
>Minor changes since the last CR:
>
>A non-normative change to Focus Not Obscured (adjusting the notes) was 
>agreed: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3083/filesAccessibility 
>Authentication had “(minimum)” added to the name:
>https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3132/files
>
>
>If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
>not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
>“not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
>before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>
>
>-Alastair
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>
>@alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 27 April 2023 07:34:14 UTC