-0.5
I believe that what this SC requires should be exclusively the
responsibility of user agents and so does not belong in a recommendation
related to content authors. My understanding is that some, but not all EPUB
readers already have such mechanisms, and so that at best, this can be an
occasional issue in the case that broad support for EPUB readers is part of
an organisation's accessibility support policy.
This has been discussed on calls before. I don't think further discussion
is needed. Since I seem to be the only person to have this concern, I ask
the chairs to note my objection and proceed with the decision.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:27 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday 19th at noon Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed the updates to *Page Break Navigation*:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/page-break-navigation.html
>
>
>
> Call minutes:
> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/30-ag-minutes.html#item05
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/02/09-ag-minutes.html#item09
>
>
>
> Survey:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-fixed-ref-points-updates/results
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
