> ... IMO within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without the push of that 30% nothing more would be done. I hope that proves to be true. History will tell ... In the meantime, I suggest we not get too strident in the interpretation of our new SCs, until we see what happens with what we've put out there. We ​ say in our standard​ "The Working Group considers that WCAG 2.1 incrementally advances web content accessibility guidance for all these areas..." Let's keep it "incremental" ... Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess < josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > David MacDonald wrote: > > These fast implementation cycles are based on the AGILE world... and in > the AGILE world we also have Minimal Viable product (MVP) delivery which > I'd say we've overstepped a bit with a 30% increase with this version. > Let's not widen it further right now. > > While I hear your point, I don't think we have overstepped at all. IMO > within the twin cultures of MVP and minimum compliance without the push > of that 30% nothing more would be done. > > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director | InterAccess.ie >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 09:24:38 UTC