Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2

Perhaps wait for the 2nd public working draft in the summer when we have
some momentum and processes in place for vetting?

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Then *how* are we going to expect getting feedback and ideas on testing
> and techniques on those items that might be ‘At Risk’?
>
>
>
> ​​​​​** katie **
>
>
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
>
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>
>
> NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an
> expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I
> am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and -
> that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque
> Systems.
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:42 PM
> *To:* Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
> *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2
>
>
>
> >>The FPWD does not need to include all the proposed SC. It only needs to
> include those SC that have been reviewed and categorised by the time the
> FPWD is expected. Other SC can be added incrementally to subsequent WD
> as/when.
>
>
>
>
>
> ​That makes sense to me.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2017 18:06, David MacDonald wrote:
>
> but I'm concerned that the world is watching for WCAG next, and has been
> waiting over 8 years. Is this the first thing we want to release to
> these stakeholders in 8 years?
>
>
> No.
>
>
> I think we may want to postpone our release date for the FPWD, until we
> can parse these, figure out how we are going to organize them and make
> some preliminary vetting.
>
>
> The FPWD does not need to include all the proposed SC. It only needs to
> include those SC that have been reviewed and categorised by the time the
> FPWD is expected. Other SC can be added incrementally to subsequent WD
> as/when.
>
> Please don't consider delaying the timeline. Eight years is far too long
> as it is - let's not make it worse.
>
> Léonie.
>
>
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
>
>