Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation

Following up on this email from last week as no one has commented and want to make sure that people give it some thought…

Anyone have any new editorial changes that they have identified in the WCAG 2.0 document that they can share?

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk

http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility


From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 11:21
To: WCAG
Subject: Publishing an Editing Recommendation
Resent-From: WCAG
Resent-Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 11:22

Working Group,

One of the items that we are chartered for is the release of an edited Recommendation to address just the editorial errata – not any changes except editorial ones.

We would like to ask people to submit any additional errata to the group for consideration before we start the process.  Items like spelling errors, incorrect language codes on examples, and other errors that don’t affect the meaning of the normative text are good examples.  You are welcome to submit any errata you find, but just be aware that only the truly editorial ones will be in the edited recommendation and the others will be recorded for future consideration.

Please take a look at the WCAG 2.0 recommendation and familiarize yourself with the existing editorial errata (links below) and in the next two weeks please submit any new errata for review.

WCAG 2.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

Errata: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk

http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility

Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 13:35:36 UTC