Of course "important" is not a good term - I'm sure we can find a better one... > Am 10.06.2015 um 22:17 schrieb Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>: > > is “important” a testable term. too subjective to be a failure? (fails to meet the “always a failure” test for failures?) > > gregg > > ---------------------------------- > Gregg Vanderheiden > gregg@raisingthefloor.org > > > > >> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> what I'm thinking about is adding a failure technique: important information is just placed in headers or footers. What is an "important" information? >> >> Just two examples: >> >> # information about the author is just placed in footer. >> >> # contact informations are just placed in headers or footers and not elsewhere in the document >> >> By adding a failure technique we I believe could adress different user preferences but make sure that important informations which are placed just in headers or footers will fail the SC. >> >> Cheers >> >> Kerstin >> >> >> >> >> # >> >> >> >>> Am 10.06.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> * katie * >>> >>> Katie Haritos-Shea >>> Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) >>> >>> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 >>> >>> From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org] >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 2:38 PM >>> To: Jonathan Avila >>> Cc: Allen Hoffman; David MacDonald; GLWAI Guidelines WG org >>> Subject: Re: Should PDF documents have headers and footers on every page? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> gregg >>> >>> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>> So this issue is very much a user preference and thus flexibility should be afforded to the user to choose which way they want information provided. >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 20:20:58 UTC