Re: Summary of arguements FOR validity -- and another against -- and a third of alternatives from Gez Lemon on 2005-11-05 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2005)

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 01:42:34 +0000
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <e2a28a920511041742u33be17f9i@mail.gmail.com>

One of the points in the FOR section has a typo - it should read:

* People get prosecuted because they fail to consider others, *not*
for having invalid content

Apologies

Gez

--
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com

Received on Saturday, 5 November 2005 01:42:38 UTC