Re: [techs] Techniques requirements ready for TR

Hello Roberto,

It is not a mistake.  We removed it for the following reasons:

1. WCAG 2.0 was the only reference in that section.

2. There were several places in the document where we directly linked to an 
external resource. WCAG 2.0 was the only one that we had an indirect link 
to  (i.e., instead of linking directly to WCAG 2.0 in the text, we linked 
to a target in the references section and then the target linked to the 
external WCAG 2.0 resource). Instead, we now directly link to all of the 
resources throughout the document.

Is this an issue that you feel needs to be fixed?  If so, does it need to 
be fixed before moving to TR?

Thanks,
--wendy

At 12:48 PM 2/5/2003, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote:

>Hi Michael,
>i see that the point 6 has been removed:
>
>6 References
>WCAG2
>Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, B. Caldwell, W. Chisholm, J.
>White, G. Vanderheiden. World Wide Web Consortium, 25 January 2001, revised
>22 August 2002.
>
>
>is this a mistake?
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>
>To: "WAI GL (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:29 PM
>Subject: [techs] Techniques requirements ready for TR
>
>
>
>At the teleconference last Thursday we agreed on some final edits needed
>before posting the Techniques Requirements draft [1] to the TR page. We have
>also discussed this with Judy Brewer and made a few additional edits. Please
>review the draft to see if there are any burning issues. If we don't receive
>objections we will post this to TR on Friday.
>
>Michael
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/sources/wd-wcag2-tech-req.html
>
>Michael Cooper
>Accessibility Project Manager
>Watchfire
>1 Hines Rd
>Kanata, ON  K2K 3C7
>Canada
>+1 613 599 3888 x4019
>http://bobby.watchfire.com/

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/--

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 13:02:50 UTC