- From: Boland Jr., Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:26:28 -0400
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- CC: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I'm OK with them ________________________________________ From: Jan Richards [jan.richards@utoronto.ca] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:47 PM To: Boland Jr., Frederick E. Subject: Two remaining issues Hi Tim, There are just two issues left needing your consent: (1) Rewording the "'Included' and 'Excluded' Technologies" section into "Web Content Technologies Produced": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0002.html (2) Removing the (lengthy) definition of "conforming alternate version" because it is not linked from anywhere in our doc. The one place we do use the term is in the Intent of B.2.1.3 (but terms in the Intent sections are not linked to the Glossary). Instead we link to the WCAG 2.0 definition directly under "Related Resources for Success Criterion B.2.1.3:". (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0003.html) If you are ok with these can you inform the list? If not, please let me know ASAP. (On the call, we agree to set the Last Call vote for Monday April 12 - so the sooner we can get these two items settled, the better). Cheers, Jan
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 23:28:05 UTC