- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:03:16 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: gk@ninebynine.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: [...] > > But I think it's clear that neither " 10 " or "10.0" are > valid lexical forms for xsd:integer and their occurrence > in a typed literal would be an error. That was Peter's point. These can be part of a syntically correct RDF graph and the semantics doc allows them to have a meaning, so in his view, they are not an error. At this point I should give up speaking for him. Brian
Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 07:06:34 UTC