- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:28:05 +0200
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com] > Sent: 12 September 2002 16:24 > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: ext Brian McBride; Patrick Stickler; RDF Core > Subject: RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline > literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items) > > > [...] > > > I suggest an abstract syntax along the lines of: > > > > An RDF Literal Node can be labelled with one of: > > > > - an RDF String Literal (as now) > > - an RDF XML Literal (as now) > > - a value from the value space of a datatype. > > so they are selfdenoting (as now) What any literal denotes is a question for Pat not for me! (or at least is not on-topic in this thread) Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 11:28:35 UTC