- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:11:35 +0300
- To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
OK. I assert that the two cases below are not syntactically identical and that whether they are semantically identical cannot be determined by the RDF MT alone but requires extra-RDF knowledge about the datatype in question. Patrick [Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 50) 483 9453, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] ----- Original Message ----- From: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> Sent: 11 September, 2002 17:20 Subject: RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case > > > Which one? > > From > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html > > <rdf:Description> > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop> > </rdf:Description> > > is equal (i.e. syntactically) > > <rdf:Description> > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop> > </rdf:Description> > > > (We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the > second, and/or vice versa). > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 06:11:38 UTC