- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 04 Oct 2002 09:05:43 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 07:01, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Dan > > something that I haven't understood about your position is how it works with > owl:cardinality. > > As far as I can see, all the OWL semantics proposals (including your own) > require access to the *integer* value of owl:cardinality. Nope; in the semantics I proposed, it's a numeral. > As far as I can > see, your preferred solutions to rdf datatyping provided only a *numeral* > not an *integer*. > > Can you please help me understand your position better, and how you join up > your thinking in these two areas. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 10:05:24 UTC