RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]

Hi Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] 
>
> >1) literals can't have properties, but we find xml:lang in 
> the syntax 
> >very handy, so we made it part of a literal.
> >
> >2) it means not a property of.
> 
> I'm not sure I'd go that far.  I'd have no problems with cwm, 
> for example, 
> allowing literals as subjects and making the lang a property.

I have no problem with cwm doing that; imo cwm's there to stretch the
envelope a bit. Otherwise literals  as subjects isn't RDF.

[the answers I gave are somewhat sarky, but I believe contain more than
grain of truth]

Bill de hÓra

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 08:51:41 UTC