- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:00:29 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 12, 2001, at 06:29 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > emitting the 'same' invented-URIs for un-named resource mentions is > risky: if we make the generated ID purely a function of the > bag-of-bytes > XML document we could get situations where relative URIs are used to > mention _different_ resources, but result in a parser emitting the same > generated ID. I don't have time to cook up an example right > here, but for > eg. <foo rdf:resource="../index.html"/> in different contexts means > something different, so an rdf/xml doc including that might be > mentioning > a different pair of resources. Well, obviously the URI generated would have to be based upon the base URI of the document -- otherwise it wouldn't work, as you point out. Does that solve the issue? If not, can you provide more specifics? -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 11:00:39 UTC