Meeting minutes
Title: Maturity Model
Fazio: CharlesL to send out minutes from TPAC breakout
<CharlesL> https://
New Business
<Fazio> no new business
Fazio: asked for new business, no one had anything
GitHub Che k In
Fazio: not too many new issues in Github
Fazio: surprised because people are aware and using it
sheribyrne: maybe we should conduct specific user interviews to elicit specific feedback
Lionel: maybe put together a survey
Lionel: offered to create a draft and distribute
Mark: was it easy to understand
Lionel: did you use the spreadsheet or other assets
sheribyrne: which dimensions did you use, are there any that are missing
Lionel: let's use Google forms
sheribyrne: for people who read it OR used it
Fazio: distribute it through social media
Fazio: and AGWG
sheribyrne: RQTF and APA as well
Mark: we can review Mark's github issues week after next
Mark: early regrets for next week will be on PTO
TPAC Debrief
<CharlesL> https://
sheribyrne: general discussion about TPAC
Lionel: We may want the maturity model to make more explicit and clear how an organization can engage directly with the maturity model
sheribyrne: we can add more detail to the use cases
Lionel: while remaining aligned with the current status quo regarding WCAG 2.0 / 2.1 conformance
… a use case could express this: that an organization applying the maturity model will uncover areas where they need to improve
… and it is up to their discretion what of that, if any, to share on a public-facing document
<CharlesL> s/… while remaining/Lionel: while remaining
Equity Subgroup
Fazio: call for closure on TPAC conversation
Fazio: equity subgroup and maturity model subgroup models need to jive
sheribyrne: we are way further down the road than they are
Fazio: sheribyrne should be the liason since she's already going to the meetings
sheribyrne: They want accounting for gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status
… making sure one party is not dominating the conversation
… these can be applied to the dimensions that we have
Mark: should we make a proposal on how to combine the two
sheribyrne: we didn't include equity because we were told early on that we were already overstepping by including things like personnel
sheribyrne: but of course we can add it
sheribyrne: could set up some one-off meetings to discuss so it's not maturity and not equity, it's both
Lionel: This resembles who Adapt met with COGA
… we can arrange a meeting with Equity, present and hear them out
Fazio: we have options as to how to implement this
Lionel: also, with Sheri in both groups, she may volunteer to be our go-between
sheribyrne: I will get this on the Equity agenda for Monday