<scribe> scribe: jeanne
Janina: we got good feedback from
AGWG today, with several suggestions that we needed to
follow
... we will go back to them on the 3rd
... we got a new branch of Silver research
... and many additional success criteria from Detlev
... we are going to merge the document and clean up some of the
language
Bruce: The readable version hasn't been regenerated. Has that been fixed.
Janina: I don't see the
problem.
... I will send email to the chairs in the morning if it wasn't
fixed.
Jeanne: Check the Travis bot.
That may be hanging up the update.
... I sent Janina the data for the Silver research and the
final report from the Design Sprint.
Janina: We want to look at what isn't working well after 20 years of WCAG.
<janina> Think I dropped! brb
Joe: We say that templates solve it, and it helps, if people have access to them and are using them correctly, but I don't think we can make that assumptions.
Janina: In the banking industry there has been a lot of success, but for example, it hasn't always extended to the options trading business.
Jeanne: We would also allow people to declare what part of the website/product/project they are declaring conformance for.
Janina: We should include that in the FPWD so we get feedback on it.
Jeanne: We should include the
language that Makoto gave us on how that is handled in
Japan.
... VPAT is what most people use for claiming conformance.
<Makoto> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SVDWemejSSBPPqJl4t_KBGeXWsFNWjHv0JW1y6RWgdg/edit?usp=sharing
Makoto: Japanese translation of WCAG 2.0 as an ISO standard.
<bruce_bailey> Here is one WCAG 2.1 requirement for conformance claims:
<bruce_bailey> A concise description of the Web pages, such as a list of URIs for which the claim is made, including whether subdomains are included in the claim.
<bruce_bailey> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#conformance-required
Makoto: we wanted to encourage
companies to claim conformance for their website.
... we allowed them to sample 40 pages and test them
<bruce_bailey> ITI VPAT 2 page: https://www.itic.org/policy/accessibility/vpat
Makoto: they should be random samples
<bruce_bailey> mentions wcag and EN 301 549
Makoto: Then they can claim conformance for that moment in time based on the tests for those sample pages
Joe: Are they random or prioritized by customer usage?
Makoto: There are 25 random and 15 selected
Jeanne: I think the sampling is a problem that we know how to solve and we just need to work out the proposal.
Bruce: I think we should lean on people that have done this.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/ 25 selected and 15 random/ 25 random and 15 selected/ Present: jeanne bruce_bailey janina Makoto Regrets: Peter Angela Chuck Jennifer Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Found Date: 19 Nov 2019 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]