W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

20 Jul 2015

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Jutta, T.
Chair
Jan Richards
Scribe
Jan

Contents


<scribe> Scribe: Jan

1. Update on ATAG 2.0 progress to Recommendation

JS: We had the Directors meeting last Wednesday
... Our implmentation report was accepted with minor changes
... The next stage is publishing the proposed recommendation
... Which should be soon

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/CR20/ImplementationReport

JS: Exit criteria split into two section...2013 Exit Criteria and 2015 Exit Criteria
... Also...
... In the document itself, we clarified in the References that ATAG's references to UAAG and to WCAG are normative, while the rest remain informative.
... And that was just to be consistent because in the SC, they are already declared normative.
... So this change was not judged to be substantive

Other Business

AC: Question about ATAG-WG charter....
... Does it make sense for ATAG-WG to be having input on WAI2020 with such a short end-date?

JR: While I think its fine to have input into the WAI2020 process for as long as ATAG-WG is chartered...if it is a potential obstacle to rechartering, I am fine to remove that line..

<jeanne> +1

TB: That's fine

<alastc> +1

+1

TB: +1

AC: Another point raised is on the process...
... The process re: voting and consensus would be better to match the 2014 W3C process document.

<alastc> Link about the voting: http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Votes

JS: Suggests changing the line in the ATAG-WG charter to align with the 2014 W3C Proccess document

+1

<alastc> good idea, +1

TB: +1

<jeanne> +1

<alastc> Regarding the "input to WAI 2020", I had assumed it would be after the end-date. Again, I wouldn't object to that being removed, it seems to be a general 'thing for WAI oriented members to do', rather than being ATAG specific.

AC: A suggested change that has been proposed is that ATAG-WG not be chartered to create task forces

<jeanne> I think we have no plans to create task forces

JR: Suggest removing the charter line to enter into task forces

+1

TB: +1

<alastc> +1

<jeanne> +1

AC: A suggested change is to remove the reference to good standing requirement

<alastc> Charter: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2015/draft_auwg_charter.html

http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#good-standing

JR: Let's update the reference to the new link.
... Let's update the reference for the Good Standing requirment to to the new link. (http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#good-standing)

<jeanne> +1

+1

<alastc> +1

TB: +1

JR: Other buisiness
... Other business?
... Next meeting, Monday July 27

JS: I'll be away

AC: I'm away

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015/07/20 17:49:01 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/last Friday/last Wednesday/
Succeeded: s/I am fine to remove that time/I am fine to remove that line./
Succeeded: s/Happy Retirement to Tim!//
Found Scribe: Jan
Inferring ScribeNick: Jan

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: AC Charter JR JS TB alastc jeanne
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Regrets: Jutta T.
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2015JulSep/0011.html
Got date from IRC log name: 20 Jul 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/07/20-au-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]