16:55:51 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #au
16:55:51 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/07/20-au-irc
16:55:59 <Jan> Meeting: WAI AU
16:56:35 <Jan> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2015JulSep/0011.html
16:56:42 <Jan> Regrets: Jutta T.
16:56:53 <Jan> Chair: Jan Richards
16:57:00 <Jan> Scribe: Jan
17:00:54 <alastc> alastc has joined #au
17:01:02 <jeanne> jeanne has joined #au
17:06:29 <Jan> Topic: 1. Update on ATAG 2.0 progress to Recommendation
17:06:43 <Jan> JS: We had the Directors meeting last Friday
17:07:33 <Jan> JS: Our implmentation report was accepted with minor changes
17:08:22 <Jan> JS: The next stage is publishing the proposed recommendation
17:08:30 <Jan> JS: Which should be soon
17:09:33 <Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/CR20/ImplementationReport
17:10:04 <jeanne> s/last Friday/last Wednesday
17:11:29 <Jan> JS: Exit criteria split into two section...2013 Exit Criteria and 2015 Exit Criteria
17:12:18 <Jan> JS: Also...
17:13:23 <Jan> JS: In the document itself, we clarified in the References that ATAG's references to UAAG and to WCAG are normative, while the rest remain informative.
17:13:57 <Jan> JS: And that was just to be consistent because in the SC, they are already declared normative.
17:14:19 <Jan> JS: So this change was not judged to be substantive
17:22:07 <Jan> Topic: Other Business
17:22:23 <Jan> AC: Question about ATAG-WG charter....
17:22:52 <Jan> AC: Does it make sense for ATAG-WG to be having input on WAI2020 with such a short end-date?
17:24:48 <Jan> JR: While I think its fine to have input into the WAI2020 process for as long as ATAG-WG is chartered...if it is a potential obstacle to rechartering, I am fine to remove that time.
17:24:53 <jeanne> +1
17:25:01 <Jan> TB: That's fine
17:25:06 <alastc> +1
17:25:07 <Jan> +1
17:25:19 <Jan> TB: +1
17:25:37 <Jan> AC: Another point raised is on the process...
17:26:11 <jeanne> s/I am fine to remove that time/I am fine to remove that line.
17:27:44 <Jan> AC: The process re: voting and consensus would be better to match the 2014 W3C process document.
17:27:49 <alastc> Link about the voting: http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Votes
17:28:43 <Jan> JS: Suggests changing the line in the ATAG-WG charter to align with the 2014 W3C Proccess document
17:28:49 <Jan> +1
17:29:13 <alastc> good idea, +1
17:29:20 <Jan> TB: +1
17:29:30 <jeanne> +1
17:29:39 <alastc> Regarding the "input to WAI 2020", I had assumed it would be after the end-date. Again, I wouldn't object to that being removed, it seems to be a general 'thing for WAI oriented members to do', rather than being ATAG specific.
17:31:06 <Jan> AC: A suggested change that has been proposed is that ATAG-WG not be chartered to create task forces
17:31:42 <jeanne> I think we have no plans to create task forces
17:31:55 <Jan> JR: Suggest removing the charter line to enter into task forces
17:31:58 <Jan> +1
17:32:03 <Jan> TB: +1
17:32:03 <alastc> +1
17:32:04 <jeanne> +1
17:32:28 <Jan> AC: A suggested change is to remove the reference to good standing requirement
17:33:25 <alastc> Charter: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2015/draft_auwg_charter.html
17:34:30 <Jan> http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#good-standing
17:36:24 <Jan> JR: Let's update the reference to the new link.
17:37:05 <Jan> JR: Let's update the reference for the Good Standing requirment to to the new link.  (http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#good-standing)
17:37:24 <jeanne> +1
17:37:27 <Jan> +1
17:37:31 <alastc> +1
17:37:43 <Jan> TB: +1
17:38:19 <Jan> JR: Other buisiness
17:38:26 <Jan> JR: Other business?
17:38:53 <Jan> JR: Next meeting, Monday July 27
17:38:59 <Jan> JS: I'll be away
17:39:03 <Jan> AC: I'm away
17:48:02 <Jan> Happy Retirement to Tim!
17:48:37 <Jan> s/Happy Retirement to Tim!/
17:48:56 <Jan> RRSAgent, make minutes
17:48:56 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/20-au-minutes.html Jan
17:49:17 <Jan> RRSAgent, set logs public
18:57:14 <Jan> RRSAgent, bye
18:57:14 <RRSAgent> I see no action items