W3C

- DRAFT -

User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

19 Mar 2015

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Kim_Patch, Jeanne, Jan, Greg_Lowney
Regrets
Jim
Chair
jeanne
Scribe
Jan

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 19 March 2015

<scribe> Scribe: Jan

TPAC F2F in Japan

Resolution: The UAWG group will not be attending the TPAC in Japan in Oct 2015

<jeanne> ACTION: jeanne to remind Jim to complete the TPAC chairs survey [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/03/19-ua-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-1075 - Remind jim to complete the tpac chairs survey [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2015-03-26].

Exit Criteria

<jeanne> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2015JanMar/0050.html

JS: This is the latest exit criteria draft
... Jeanne and Judy met with designate
... He encouraged us to keep the exit criteria simple
... But also he suggested we should put some more things in
... Need to explain the vertical stack clearly, that we are going to be using extensions
... That wording was removed during simplification
... We should look at CSS wording for how to do independent UI implementations
... We don't need to write anything in about rendering engines
... He agreed we are mostly testing the user interface
... I explained our issue that we don't know what's in what part of the browser
... He agreed that there are more than one way of doing it, its potentially proprietary so can't be part of exit criteria
... He did say UIs have to be diffferent
... e.g. identical pages for alt text....would not be ok
... Bottom line...don't cheat about it... but complicated wording is not necessary
... Major thing he said we need to do is continue with implementations and come up with definitive at risk
... He said HTML5 had 14 items at tisk, which is more than I thought allowed
... For some of our AAA, he also suggested being creative and calling certain SCs informative
... Also make sure all definitions of user agents include extensions and plugins

Charters

JS: Reminds everyone with connections at member companies to remind them to approve our charter

Next steps

JS: 1. Figure our implementations
... 2. Make a list of at-risk items
... 3. Formalize exit criteria
... Then we can go to CR
... Judy thinks the ATAG test harness can be brought over to UAAG
... If we push, we can finish this year

https://vivaldi.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartan_%28browser%29

<jeanne> Blank form for the UAAG Implementations. We need to consolidate all our testing information here.

<jeanne> http://w3c.github.io/UAAG-Implementations/desktop.html

<jeanne> Overview page -> http://w3c.github.io/UAAG-Implementations/index.html

<jeanne> https://github.com/w3c/UAAG-Implementations/

review github procedures for those unfamiliar with them

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: jeanne to remind Jim to complete the TPAC chairs survey [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/03/19-ua-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015-03-19 18:39:11 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Jan
Inferring ScribeNick: Jan
Default Present: Kim_Patch, Jeanne, Jan, Greg_Lowney
Present: Kim_Patch Jeanne Jan Greg_Lowney
Regrets: Jim
Found Date: 19 Mar 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/03/19-ua-minutes.html
People with action items: jeanne

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]