ISSUE-68: pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec

pre-binding

pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL - SPARQL
Raised by:
Peter Patel-Schneider
Opened on:
2015-06-12
Description:
The SHACL spec uses pre-binding, which is neither defined in the document nor in the SPARQL 1.1 query language.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: core remaining issues (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2017-01-11)
  2. ISSUE-68: New proposal (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-01-10)
  3. Proposed next steps (was: Re: core remaining issues) (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2017-01-09)
  4. Re: core remaining issues (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-01-08)
  5. core remaining issues (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2017-01-06)
  6. Re: [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2016-12-11)
  7. [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2016-12-11)
  8. Re: shapes-ISSUE-202 (Remove pre-binding from core): Suggestion to remove pre-binding from core [SHACL - Core] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-18)
  9. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-16)
  10. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-15)
  11. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-15)
  12. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-14)
  13. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-14)
  14. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-13)
  15. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-13)
  16. Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-11)
  17. RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 September 2016 (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-07)
  18. Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-08-31)
  19. need of sh:hasShape (was: Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding) (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-06-12)
  20. Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-06-12)
  21. Re: ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-06-11)
  22. ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-131: sh:hasShape and pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-06-10)
  23. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-28)
  24. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-22)
  25. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-21)
  26. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-21)
  27. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-19)
  28. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-18)
  29. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-18)
  30. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-18)
  31. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-18)
  32. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-18)
  33. Re: ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-17)
  34. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-11)
  35. ISSUE-68: Simpler definition of pre-binding (was: fundamental problems with SHACL) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-11)
  36. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-08)
  37. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-08)
  38. Re: ISSUE-68 definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-22)
  39. Re: ISSUE-68 definition of pre-binding (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-22)
  40. Re: ISSUE-68 definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-21)
  41. ISSUE-68 definition of pre-binding (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-21)
  42. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-14)
  43. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  44. Re: shaky foundations for SHACL [was Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  45. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  46. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  47. Re: shaky foundations for SHACL [was Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  48. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  49. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  50. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  51. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  52. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  53. Re: shaky foundations for SHACL [was Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  54. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  55. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  56. shaky foundations for SHACL [was Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  57. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  58. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  59. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  60. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-09)
  61. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-09)
  62. Re: ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-09)
  63. ISSUE-68: Updated definition (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-09)
  64. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-18)
  65. shapes-ISSUE-68 (pre-binding): pre-binding not defined in SHACL spec [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-12)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-68 defining pre-binding using eval(D(G), Replace(PrjMap(X), μ)) as described in https://w3c.github.io/sparql-exists/docs/sparql-exists.html

https://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-shapes-minutes.html

Irene Polikoff, 10 Feb 2017, 00:02:23

Display change log ATOM feed


Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Chairs, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $