ISSUE-32: SHACL = high-level + extensions ?
SHACL+-
SHACL = high-level + extensions ?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Peter Patel-Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2015-03-28
- Description:
- Is SHACL going to be a high-level language with an extension mechanism as an add-on or is SHACL going to be a single language with some portion of it designated as the simple portion?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-08-04)
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-30)
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-07-29)
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-07-29)
- Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-28)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-04-01)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-04-01)
- shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-03-28)
Related notes:
Resolution: Close ISSUE-32, it was addressed by the adoption of the current editor's draft.
See: http://www.w3.org/2015/07/30-shapes-minutes.html#resolution04
Display change log
