ISSUE-26: Can extensions invoke the high-level language?

invoke-highlevel

Can extensions invoke the high-level language?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Richard Cyganiak

Opened on:

2015-03-28

Description:

It looks like SHACL will be split into two parts:

1) A high-level “Core/Lite” language consisting of things like cardinality constraints, datatype constraints, conjunctions and disjunctions
2) An extension mechanism that relies on embedded expressions in a more expressive language

Can the embedded expressions in 2) invoke named expressions defined using 1)?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-26 based on sh:hasShape (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-07-28)
2. Proposal to close ISSUE-26 based on sh:hasShape (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-28)
3. Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-03)
4. Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2015-04-02)
5. Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-04-02)
6. shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-03-28)

Related notes:

Display change log