ISSUE-26: Can extensions invoke the high-level language?
invoke-highlevel
Can extensions invoke the high-level language?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2015-03-28
- Description:
- It looks like SHACL will be split into two parts:
1) A high-level “Core/Lite” language consisting of things like cardinality constraints, datatype constraints, conjunctions and disjunctions
2) An extension mechanism that relies on embedded expressions in a more expressive language
Can the embedded expressions in 2) invoke named expressions defined using 1)? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-26 based on sh:hasShape (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-07-28)
- Proposal to close ISSUE-26 based on sh:hasShape (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-28)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2015-04-02)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-04-02)
- shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-03-28)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-26, stating that extensions can invoke the high-level language referring to named shapes
See http://www.w3.org/2015/08/06-shapes-minutes.html#resolution04
Display change log