ISSUE-24: Can shapes specialise other shapes?
specialisation
Can shapes specialise other shapes?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2015-03-28
- Description:
- How to define a shape that is based on another shape, in other words, to satisfy the new shape one must satisfy the old shape plus additional constraints?
This interacts with ISSUE-1 (inference) and ISSUE-23 (punning). - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Added not, and, xor to my draft (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-05-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2015-04-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2015-04-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-04-02)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-03-28)
- shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-03-28)
Related notes:
Resolution: Close ISSUE-24, stating that specialization can be achieved via conjunctions
See http://www.w3.org/2015/05/20-shapes-minutes.html#resolution02
Display change log
