ISSUE-218: Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note?

Move annotations

Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL - SPARQL

Raised by:

Holger Knublauch

Opened on:

2017-01-17

Description:

Hi Dimitris,

I believe you were the main proponent of the injection mechanism for annotation properties into validation results (sh:annotationProperty etc).

Given the time line and complexity (e.g. the issue with mapping variable names to properties) I would suggest to remove them from the standardization track. They could be added into the WG note. Nothing depends on them.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-01-19)
2. shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-01-17)

Related notes:

Display change log