ISSUE-218: Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note?

Move annotations

Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL - SPARQL
Raised by:
Holger Knublauch
Opened on:
2017-01-17
Description:
Hi Dimitris,

I believe you were the main proponent of the injection mechanism for annotation properties into validation results (sh:annotationProperty etc).

Given the time line and complexity (e.g. the issue with mapping variable names to properties) I would suggest to remove them from the standardization track. They could be added into the WG note. Nothing depends on them.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-01-19)
  2. shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-01-17)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: close issue-218, by moving SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note

https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html

Irene Polikoff, 9 Feb 2017, 23:53:31

Display change log ATOM feed


Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, Chairs, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $