ISSUE-121: Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character
# in graph name
Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Holger Knublauch
- Opened on:
- 2016-02-04
- Description:
- The namespace of the main SHACL vocabulary is
http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#
We need to decide whether the owl:Ontology in the file includes the # or not. Both practices are used in W3C standards.
My proposal is to state
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl> a owl:Ontology
and also recommend <<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl> as the value of owl:import statements. Using the # in ontologies is in my experience a rather uncommon practice. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-18)
- Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-05)
- shapes-ISSUE-121 (# in graph name): Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-02-04)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-121, the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character
See https://www.w3.org/2016/02/18-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03
Display change log
