ISSUE-108: Should operations be specified?

operations

Should operations be specified?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL Spec
Raised by:
Peter Patel-Schneider
Opened on:
2015-10-29
Description:
Section 10 of the SHACL spec discusses operations. It does not require that they be implemented.

Should this section be removed from the spec?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: shapes-ISSUE-108 (operations): Should operations be specified? [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-10-29)
  2. shapes-ISSUE-108 (operations): Should operations be specified? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-10-29)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-108, the one specified way to invoke SHACL validation is an interface that takes a data graph and a shapes graph.
See http://www.w3.org/2015/12/17-shapes-minutes.html#resolution01

Arnaud Le Hors, 17 Dec 2015, 22:12:25

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $