ISSUE-105: SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined

defined prefixes

SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL Spec
Raised by:
Peter Patel-Schneider
Opened on:
2015-10-29
Description:
From Section 6.2:

Before parsing, a SHACL processor must prepend PREFIX statements for all namespace prefixes defined in the current shapes graph.

Namespace prefixes are not defined in an RDF graph, so this cannot be done.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-105: Updated proposal with sh:prefixes (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-15)
  2. Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-09)
  3. Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-08)
  4. Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from markh@metarelate.net on 2016-09-08)
  5. RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 September 2016 (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-07)
  6. ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-02)
  7. Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-08-31)
  8. RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 August 2016 (from eric@w3.org on 2016-08-24)
  9. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-09)
  10. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-09)
  11. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-08)
  12. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from eric@w3.org on 2016-05-08)
  13. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-07)
  14. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-07)
  15. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-06)
  16. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-06)
  17. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from jamsden@us.ibm.com on 2016-05-06)
  18. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-06)
  19. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from miika.alonen@csc.fi on 2016-05-06)
  20. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-05)
  21. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from eric@w3.org on 2016-04-24)
  22. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-24)
  23. Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-23)
  24. ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-23)
  25. Re: ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-04-22)
  26. Re: ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from jamsden@us.ibm.com on 2016-04-22)
  27. ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-22)
  28. Some issues that may be close to resolution (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-06)
  29. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 3 March 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-03)
  30. ISSUE-105: Updated proposals (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-19)
  31. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-18)
  32. Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
  33. Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
  34. Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-10-29)
  35. Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-10-29)
  36. shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-10-29)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-105 adopting the so called "decomposed prefixes in Turtle" proposal drafted by Holger in https://rawgit.com/w3c/data-shapes/bf5efb571196cf3c6b63137302c9c13a369e3466/shacl/index.html#sparql-prefixes
See http://www.w3.org/2016/09/21-shapes-minutes.html#resolution04

Arnaud Le Hors, 27 Sep 2016, 16:57:49

Display change log ATOM feed


Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, Chairs, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $