W3C's contribution was on behalf of the Smart Open Data
project, in which it is a partner, co-funded by the European Commission´s DG-ENV under the
Seventh Framework Programme
Linking Geospatial Data workshop
What it was all about
The stars of the show: Miss Globe and Mr Cube, created by Frans Knibbe of Geodan
Recurring Themes
Use HTTP URIs as identifiers;
How should we handle multiple URIs for the same thing?
How should different systems refer to the same 'place?'
How can we provide complexity when needed without making simple things hard?
Location applies to just about everything, including news stories, articles, histories, statistics …
Time is a Coordinate Reference System
Other Topics
Services created by projects are often very good but may not have any guarantee of longevity.
Large scale open source tools don't always implement all the features you need.
Steve Peters: Helping me as a user to navigate through the maze of standards, to show the best way to prepare, publish and encourage reuse of data. Best practice, support, peer networking.
Keith Jeffery: Standardized terminology of metadata, taking into account the different levels of metadata required by different applications.
Alex Coley: There are lots of parts of the picture that I'd like to see brought together into a coherent whole.
John Goodwin: +1 to what's been said… agreement on best practice and the standards, tools to implement them.
Kerry Taylor: A shared spatial vocabulary that's useful and easy to do.
Raphaël Troncy: +1 to Kerry.
Bill Roberts: I think we have enough standards, but I don't know how to use them. So: design patterns where people can document how they use standards.
Jeremy Tandy: We've identified 4 geospatial vocabs for identifying geometry. Could we get it down to 1? Agree it? NeoGeo? Core location? GeoSPARQL? W3C Geo? Can we have a vote?