See also: IRC log
MarkCrawford, ping me when you need help, I'll be on the call today
<MarkCrawford> correct
<MarkCrawford> still getting used to the various functions, so pls bear with me
<MarkCrawford> test
<MarkCrawford> what conference is this?
<MarkCrawford> thanks Pavlik
<Arnaud> harry, there is no need to do anything like that
<Arnaud> trackbot does it all
<trackbot> Sorry, Arnaud, I don't understand 'trackbot does it all'. Please refer to <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
<Arnaud> even if it doesn't understand ;-)
<Arnaud> once you issue the command trackbot, start meeting you're all set
<jasnell> I'm not near a laptop currently. Hard to scribe from a tablet :-/
<MarkCrawford> I thought tablets could do everything :-)
<jasnell> I'll volunteer to scribe next call
<MarkCrawford> thanks. Noted :-)
<scribe> scribe: hhalpin
<lehawes> Larry Hawes just logged in
<lloydfassett> zakin, 5418482440 is lloydfassett
<lehawes> I'm probably P26
<lehawes> Harry: thanks!
<elf-pavlik> lloydfassett, i did it!
<lehawes> I'm calling from 978 area
<lehawes> but using Google Voice, which usually shows up as a SV area code
MarkCrawford: Welcome
everyone
... Ed Krebs from Ford will be joining us as an invited
expert
... he's going to contribute to the use-cases and participated
in the workshop last year
... I'm very pleased he's participating going forward
... we are workig on Microsoft
... it would be great if someone from Microsoft could be
OK.
... still working on minutes on 20th
haven't had time to manually convert those IRC logs
scribe: notes will be posted on
wikipage
... will create a wiki page for each meeting similar to how
Social WG is doing it.
... any questions?
MarkCrawford: Will set up tracker with issues shortly and then announce
<lehawes> harry: I'm muted locally, so no need to do so via Zakim
MarkCrawford: Please
register
... you can also attend both WG and IG as an observer
... yesterday on WG call we discussed the co-oridnaton between
the two
... the IG, as discussed on our last call, we'll co-ordinate
with the WG
... do people want a separate meeting of the IG?
... if we do, we'd need to do it at a time that wouldn't
interfere with the WG
... any thoughts?
<lehawes> Yes, we should have a separate meeting of the IG. Would hate to miss the opportunity for F2F discussion/work.
MarkCrawford: we'll try to engage with the next meeting
MarkCrawford: Did set-up a
wiki
... there is a page for each of the task force
for example see https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Architecture_TF
Markus: So I haven't done that yet
<lloydfassett> What is the link to the agenda?
<MarkCrawford> I am
Markus: so if you have interest in working on deliverables, can you identify yourself in IRC
<lloydfassett> I am signed up for Vocabulary
+1
<jasnell> +1
<lwgoix> +1
<Arnaud> lloydfassett, here is the agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/2014-09-03
MarkCrawford: There's going to be
some overlap
... would like to start out
<elf-pavlik> +q
Markus: Some of the use-cases seem very broad
<lehawes> elf-pavlik: question is whether you're interested in participating in use case development for IG
MarkCrawford: There's use-cases in the CTO guide to Social Business and XG report you could draw from
Markus: We'll have to collect them and prioritize them
MarkCrawford: Speaking from the
architecture report perspective
... this will definitey help
Markus: Can we produce a document that will be useful when we formally meet up
<elf-pavlik> I suggested to *selfdogfood* and take some of the use cases related to workflows in W3C
<elf-pavlik> thank you :)
<lehawes> harry: I've got my audio muted again now. btw, it was me speaking about use cases, not "lehawes"
MarkCrawford: Right now, its just
very brief entries in the wiki
... we'll need amplificaitons of those
... where will things be uesful
<elf-pavlik> +1
<jasnell> +1
+1
<MarkCrawford> +1
MarkCrawford: I did set up an
architecture page
... created a link to Jeff Jaffe's report to the AC
... with an architecture block diagram
... subsequent work by Ann on this
... we could start with that
<elf-pavlik> schema.org/Actions & Hydra (W3C CG)
<jasnell> AS2, schema.org/Actions, and Hydra ... it's specifically focused on Actions right now. It's only one part
MarkCrawford: There is some WG
comparisons between schema.org and AS
... discussions in very early stages
<elf-pavlik> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2014Sep/0006.html
<jasnell> the discussion has been happening on the socialig and socialwg mailing list. However, some individuals from Google have participated in the conversation by cc
Arnaud, only members can post
<jasnell> specifically... Sam Goto
Sam Goto's posts are likely not going through
I suggest we set up a read/write list (comments)
<elf-pavlik> +1 harry
and then cc the conversation between you and Sam there
I'll request that today
<jasnell> I will forward Sam's responses
<lehawes> MarkCrawford: It looks like Lloyd dropped off phone and IRC
MarkCrawford: Can you see what other groups are interested in vocabulary effort
<MarkCrawford> yes
jasnell, just forward to WG list until we get a comments list going
<lloydfassett> sorry...don't know how that happened. Will call backin
jasnell: Conversation between myself and Sam Goto
<elf-pavlik> ack, jasnell
MarkCrawford: I haven't asked internally at SAP between schema.org or another vocabulary
<lehawes> jasnell: It would be great to see if anyone from WG wants to have input on IG use cases as well
MarkCrawford: my personal opinion is the less the better
jasnell: I agree, but we want to have that conversation in the WG
MarkCrawford: Is that an action to have a liasion?
lloydfassett: please send comments to mailing list
<lehawes> lwgoix: What is your full name please?
MarkCrawford: We may want to consider ourselves being proactive
<jasnell> I'm good with that, just need to identify which groups to announce ourselves to
MarkCrawford: one of responsibilities is messaging and if we can support them with requirements
<elf-pavlik> +1 announcing Social(IG/WG) to other groups we see relevant
<lehawes> MarkCrawford: +1 on "marketing" IG to other WGs
<jasnell> no further business at this time
MarkCrawford: AOB?
... Next call is Sept 17th
... just ask Harry and myself now
<lehawes> MarkCrawford: I will not be able to participate in 9/17 meeting, due to a conference conflict. Sorry!
I'm happy to chair if Mark can't make it
<elf-pavlik> thanks MarkCrawford & harry for chairing and scribing!!!
MarkCrawford: Thanks for participating everyone
<MarkCrawford> harry - can you do the command to log the minutes?
trackbot, end meeting
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Markus/lehawes/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: harry Found Scribe: hhalpin WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Arnaud FP IPcaller MarkCrawford MarkCrawford_ Markus P26 P34 P9 S_SOCIG S_Track Style_CSS Tsyesika WAIT WAI_Team XML_XMLCore aaaa aabb aaronpk active daveskiba dnt elf-pavlik harry hhalpin jasnell joined lehawes lloydfassett lwgoix oshepherd rhiaro socialig trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Got date from IRC log name: 03 Sep 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-socialig-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]