W3C

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

03 Sep 2014

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
shadi, carlos, samuel
Regrets
emmanuelle
Chair
shadi
Scribe
shadi

Contents


https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/labels/needs%20discussion

https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues

CV: reviewed all proposed resolutions

SM: reviewed all proposed resolutions until Issue #58

RESOLUTION: issues 1 through 58, except those marked "needs discussion", are now resolved according to their respective proposed resolutions

https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/labels/needs%20discussion

Issues #1 and #10 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/1 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/10

CV: concerned that by calling styling and scriptiing "auxiliary", they would be seen as less important

SAZ: could list them as sub-bullets to "markup formats" and introduce them as part of the markup
... this way they would not be at the same level but also well-positioned and introduced

CV: could work

https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/51

SM: "resource formats" rather than "content types"

CV: like it

SAZ: beware of the word "documents" when refering to HTML

SM: concerned about being absolut that CSS evaluation on its own makes no sense
... there are some situations where it could make sense

CV: maybe use the word "in general"

SM: yes

RESOLUTION: issues 1, 10, and 51 are resolved according to this discussion

Issue #54 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/54

https://w3c.github.io/w3c-waet/WAET.html#manual

http://www.w3.org/TR/WAET/#manual

"There are some evaluation tools that support accessibility experts by performing semiautomatic or manual tests"

"why there might be value in each"

SAZ: rephrase "accroding to EARL..." to something like "tools carry out testing in different modes"
... to make testing modes the main point, rather than the EARL definition

Evaluation tools carry out testing in different modes. For example, one evaluation tool could <manual example, while another may <semi-auto example>

RESOLUTION: issue 54 is resolved accoring to the updated proposed resolution and this discussion

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.139 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014/09/08 13:45:45 $