12:27:17 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:27:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-er-irc 12:27:19 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:27:19 Zakim has joined #er 12:27:21 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:27:21 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 12:27:22 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:27:22 Date: 03 September 2014 12:28:37 zakim, call shadi-617 12:28:37 ok, shadi; the call is being made 12:28:38 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 12:28:39 +Shadi 12:30:36 carlos has joined #er 12:31:00 +??P13 12:35:21 +??P14 12:35:47 samuelm has joined #er 12:36:14 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/labels/needs%20discussion 12:39:00 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues 12:40:02 CV: reviewed all proposed resolutions 12:42:19 SM: reviewed all proposed resolutions until Issue #58 12:43:14 RESOLUTION: issues 1 through 58, except those marked "needs discussion", are now resolved according to their respective proposed resolutions 12:44:19 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/labels/needs%20discussion 12:45:25 Topic: Issues #1 and #10 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/1 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/10 12:55:26 CV: concerned that by calling styling and scriptiing "auxiliary", they would be seen as less important 12:56:07 SAZ: could list them as sub-bullets to "markup formats" and introduce them as part of the markup 12:56:31 ...this way they would not be at the same level but also well-positioned and introduced 12:56:34 CV: could work 12:58:22 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/51 13:00:01 SM: "resource formats" rather than "content types" 13:00:28 CV: like it 13:02:18 SAZ: beware of the word "documents" when refering to HTML 13:06:34 SM: concerned about being absolut that CSS evaluation on its own makes no sense 13:06:52 ...there are some situations where it could make sense 13:07:03 CV: maybe use the word "in general" 13:07:07 SM: yes 13:07:36 RESOLUTION: issues 1, 10, and 51 are resolved according to this discussion 13:08:33 Topic: Issue #54 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/54 13:09:17 https://w3c.github.io/w3c-waet/WAET.html#manual 13:11:27 http://www.w3.org/TR/WAET/#manual 13:12:21 "There are some evaluation tools that support accessibility experts by performing semiautomatic or manual tests" 13:20:12 "why there might be value in each" 13:26:36 SAZ: rephrase "accroding to EARL..." to something like "tools carry out testing in different modes" 13:27:06 ...to make testing modes the main point, rather than the EARL definition 13:30:01 Evaluation tools carry out testing in different modes. For example, one evaluation tool could 13:32:00 -??P13 13:32:12 -Shadi 13:32:18 -??P14 13:32:18 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended 13:32:18 Attendees were Shadi 13:33:19 RESOLUTION: issue 54 is resolved accoring to the updated proposed resolution and this discussion 13:33:28 trackbot, end meeting 13:33:28 Zakim, list attendees 13:33:28 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 13:33:36 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:33:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:33:37 RRSAgent, bye 13:33:37 I see no action items