See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 20 May 2014
<clown> agenda: this
<scribe> Scribenick: joanie
JS: One of the things in the last meeting minutes is: While I was on vacation, think of what edits you might want (or not want) in the next heart beat draft
DB: Review the whole document, right?
JS: (confirms)
I didn't get that
<clown> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html#aria-haspopup
<bgaraventa1979> It appears that aria-haspopup is mapped to role=button in the UIAG, but not to links, should it be mapped to menu there too?
JS: It's not in the role mapping
table
... It's in the states and properties table
... Which roles should I look at in roles?
BG: Under button
JS: (Reads from spec)
... If button has aria-haspopup true, map to role button
menu
BG: What should happen when aria-haspopup is applied to links
JS: (Reads)
<clown> Expose as STATE_SYSTEM_HASPOPUP
JS: So if it's on a link, it's telling you it has a popup menu
<clown> From the spec: Indicates that the http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html#dfn-element has a popup context menu or sub-level menu
DB: How do we indicated a popup that's not a menu?
JS: At the moment we don't
<bgaraventa1979> tjos ca,e i[ ;ast wjere O wasled wjy cam
JS: aria-haspopup was supposed to be semantic equivalent to visual triangle
<bgaraventa1979> I was asked last week why can't it be applied to modal popups, popup overlays, etc.
DB: Should we do things more general? Why assume it's going to be a menu
<davidb> Why not get rid of aria-haspopup and have aria-haspoprole="foo" to take the guesswork away. (Since wild web and all)
<davidb> or haspopuprole
JD: Agrees with suggestion
<davidb> e.g aria-popuprole="menu"
JS: And the role value would be
an aria role
... I'm going to suggest you look for the issue filed by Steve
asking why this property is limited to menus.
... It's either 1.1 or 2.0, but I forgoet which.
<bgaraventa1979> I'm happy to support extending this to more than menus
JS: I do get the impression that it has to be "attached"; it can't be another window.
DB: I'm not seeing it 1.1
issues.
... I'll just email Steve
JS: I don't think this is going
to make it into the heart beat. :)
... Anything else (quick and dirty edit we can make) that can
go into the heartbeat draft?
... The last couple of weeks we resolved issues (e.g. tab
panels not live regions)
... I have made these changes.
... I also made sure the document is formatted properly.
... I'm prepared to say to the main group that the UAIG is
ready for a heart beat release.
DB: I don't think there's anything to block that.
JS: There's also a change from
Apple regarding aria-busy.
... So I made that change in the UAIG.
<clown> action-1434?
<trackbot> action-1434 -- David Bolter to Contact matt king regarding issue-481, especially regarding multi-process -- due 2014-05-13 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1434
DB: I wanted to do a few tests first.
<clown> issue-481?
<trackbot> issue-481 -- aria-live removal events should or must happen before object removal -- open
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/481
DB: As I recall, the consensus
was to leave it as SHOULD.
... This may be a courtesy email, or it may become a
discussion.
... I think I should probably just send it and I can do the
testing later.
JD: This strikes me as being an issue of common sense rather than something that is W3C.
<davidb> agreed
JD: If the object is already defunct before you emit the signal to the platform accessibility tool, you are in danger of a browser crash.
<bgaraventa1979> can it be passed as part of the event? like an arg?
<bgaraventa1979> similare to removeChild
DB: The statement could be more
along the lines of notifying ATs what has be removed
... How they do so is up to them
CS: So should it still be a
SHOULD
... They don't in IE because of performance concerns
DB: You might want to destroy objects more quickly
JS: Should I change David's action to another date?
DB: Next week is fine
<clown> action-1368?
<trackbot> action-1368 -- Cynthia Shelly to Investigate implementation of aria-live region events in ie apropos issue-481. -- due 2014-04-29 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1368
JS: We'll wait for the response from Matt and go from there.
JD: Suggests that perhaps for 2.0 we should consider alternatives to children-changed:removed as this is a cross-platform, cross-toolkit issue
JS: That was discussed as part of
the previous item.
... The issue got a note and has been closed.
<clown> action-1306?
<trackbot> action-1306 -- Cynthia Shelly to Cynthia to find the right people at MS to talk about UI automation -- due 2013-11-19 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1306
JS: (reads the issue)
<clown> http://www.w3.org/2013/11/12-testing-minutes.html#item02
JS: There's a note to see testing minutes (link above)
CS: I have found the right people
and they are discussing it.
... I think we can close this issue.
JS: Closed with a note.
<clown> action-1311?
<trackbot> action-1311 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Clarify that presentation role should preserve separation of nodes within tables/lists; work out in UAIG 1.1 and with implementors/vendors how to resolve this. -- due 2014-01-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1311
JS: This is one of mine.
... There was a point where Alex made some changes to the way
Firefox emitted
<clown> <table role="presentation" …>
JS: And all the text was joined
together.
... In the end Alex changed something back.
... And I think he fixed it. And it turned into:
<clown> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=945435
<clown> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=945435#c9
JS: Quotes Rich from the above
comment 9.
... Quotes from the action
... We defer to the spec
... In the role mapping table we say see the roles about
presentation
... Which refers back to the spec
... What does it say in the spec?
... The spec is not going to saying anything as specific as an
IA2 text frame
... So, I have enough info that I could write something for
role table
... for IA2
... I don't know what to say for the other platforms
<clown> \o?
<clown> \o/
JS: We can create a new
issue
... And then make new actions for that issue
<scribe> ACTION: Joanie to investigate the ideal ATK/AT-SPI2 mapping for role presentation in tables and lists. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/05/20-aapi-irc]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1444 - Investigate the ideal atk/at-spi2 mapping for role presentation in tables and lists. [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2014-05-27].
<scribe> ACTION: Cynthia to investigate the ideal UAI mapping for role presentation in tables and lists. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/05/20-aapi-irc]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1445 - Investigate the ideal uai mapping for role presentation in tables and lists. [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2014-05-27].
<clown> issue-661?
<trackbot> issue-661 -- UAIG1.1: Specify how to map children of table/lists with role presentation. -- open
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/661
trackbot, help
<trackbot> Please see <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
<clown> action-1444?
<trackbot> action-1444 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Investigate the ideal atk/at-spi2 mapping for role presentation in tables and lists. -- due 2014-06-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1444
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/the opinion/the impression/ Found ScribeNick: joanie Inferring Scribes: joanie Default Present: +1.416.848.aaaa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, David_Bolter, Joanmarie_Diggs, Bryan_Garaventa, cyns Present: Joseph_Scheuhammer David_Bolter Joanmarie_Diggs Bryan_Garaventa Cynthia Found Date: 20 May 2014 People with action items: cynthia joanie WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]